Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

doc03

(35,296 posts)
2. Same here I am 64 and retired, if I didn't have an
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 08:21 PM
Nov 2012

employer pension I couldn't stay in my home with my SS income. Put whatever you can in
a Roth IRA or 401k.

I'm in exactly the same situation: boguspotus Nov 2012 #1
Same here I am 64 and retired, if I didn't have an doc03 Nov 2012 #2
I'm 58 and been paying since I was 14... KelleyD Nov 2012 #3
Not only that. I didn't believe that a party who'd cut for younger would leave current beneficiaries Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #18
cutting benefits for younger folks while leaving them for older folks is the same 'two-tier' crap HiPointDem Nov 2012 #27
Bingo eridani Nov 2012 #47
Yup, I just crossed the 50 yr marker. Started working at 11 yrs old as a golf caddy. riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #4
53 since 14 years old and I agree start contacting your state rep! Rocky888 Nov 2012 #5
I am afraid you won't have anyone to vote for then, I'll doc03 Nov 2012 #6
We have to keep Social Security as the "third rail" of politics nichomachus Nov 2012 #7
...or we'll run them out of town on a third rail. nt Qutzupalotl Nov 2012 #12
Yup. Island Blue Nov 2012 #8
47 years old, started working when I was 16 too pitbullgirl1965 Nov 2012 #10
I started at 12 but not sure if the babysitting type jobs paid it in - TBF Nov 2012 #23
1965 Baby! tk2kewl Nov 2012 #54
Do you remember in 1980 when they raised the SS retirement age ? PoliticAverse Nov 2012 #9
The poster in the OP would have been 18 yrs old. Most teens aren't paying attention to retirement riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #11
I'm 57 and have been working from a similar age maui902 Nov 2012 #13
WHAT? A deal *now*, while "we" (who is this "we"?) have leverage? If you mean soon to be HiPointDem Nov 2012 #35
What do you propose, then, maui902 Nov 2012 #44
What does a discussion of "deficit" reduction have to do with Social Security? retread Nov 2012 #46
Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that the answer to your question is "nothing". maui902 Nov 2012 #50
How do we get policy to reflect the will of the people? PETRUS Nov 2012 #56
One more try maui902 Nov 2012 #67
I got you. PETRUS Nov 2012 #71
Honestly, I respect your position maui902 Nov 2012 #72
i propose not making deals with terrorists and telling the world they're terrorists. HiPointDem Nov 2012 #70
Nonsense. There are no financial problems with SocSec that can't be fixed by raising the cap eridani Nov 2012 #49
Stop the wars. WinkyDink Nov 2012 #57
In the same boat. Any cutbacks or pushing back retirment age is stealing from me. JHB Nov 2012 #14
K&R forestpath Nov 2012 #15
Social Security isn't part of the deficit...its a whole different problem davidn3600 Nov 2012 #16
The problem is, the GOP and big business wants everyone to rustydog Nov 2012 #20
And when you have people working into their seventies because they can't afford to retire Fumesucker Nov 2012 #22
I worked until I was 71. I am now 73. RebelOne Nov 2012 #69
No, that's not the problem. It doesn't matter how many workers support how many retirees, it HiPointDem Nov 2012 #36
Utter right wing tripe eridani Nov 2012 #52
been paying in almost 40 years Skittles Nov 2012 #17
If there are going to be cuts... Sophiegirl Nov 2012 #19
with interest, of course. tavernier Nov 2012 #51
Just out of curiosity, billh58 Nov 2012 #21
Reagan cut SS when he signed the Bill to tax 50% of SS benefits. Clinton cut SS more when he signed AnotherMcIntosh Nov 2012 #39
The taxation doesn't apply to all recipients: WinkyDink Nov 2012 #58
No, it's means-testing, which is unhelpful. nt PETRUS Nov 2012 #60
You're right, it doesn't. But that doesn't negate the fact that Reagan and Clinton reduced SS AnotherMcIntosh Nov 2012 #64
Third rail it! EOM ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2012 #24
Younger People Should Be Concerned Too Liberalynn Nov 2012 #25
Virtually all of my generation is JoeyT Nov 2012 #42
Thank you for fighting for the previous generation Liberalynn Nov 2012 #66
Social Security being in jeopardy is a big lie. lalalu Nov 2012 #26
Increase social security benefits The Second Stone Nov 2012 #28
*1 Liberalynn Nov 2012 #30
Hear, hear. nt woo me with science Nov 2012 #34
I can agree with that. RebelOne Nov 2012 #73
enough donnasgirl Nov 2012 #29
What about those that are 60 to 64 Dems50State Nov 2012 #31
It probably won't work like that. JoeyT Nov 2012 #43
You're right..... ReRe Nov 2012 #32
Benefits should be raised, first of all because those who paid into SS and are currently elegible sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #33
SS HAS $2.6 TRILLION SURPLUS ErikJ Nov 2012 #37
I'm 65 this month, just got my Medicare card mountain grammy Nov 2012 #38
Exactement! Mme. Defarge Nov 2012 #40
Just one more thing ... Mme. Defarge Nov 2012 #41
It's been so long I almost forgot my grandparents who didn't have Medicare mountain grammy Nov 2012 #55
I'll be 62 very soon and I feel exactly the same way. nt. OldDem2012 Nov 2012 #45
The Big Lie is that SS adds to the deficit. alarimer Nov 2012 #48
46 and I also have been working since 14 years old. Bonobo Nov 2012 #53
Me too. I remember my Mom explaining what that deduction from my progressoid Nov 2012 #59
Hear hear... quispquake Nov 2012 #61
Me too. Same age. Horse with no Name Nov 2012 #62
i started paying in at 12. agreed. nt seabeyond Nov 2012 #63
I turned 59 two weeks ago. I've paid into Social Security since I was 17. magical thyme Nov 2012 #65
I'm with ya ....ANY politician in favor of cuts in Social Security and Medicare lovuian Nov 2012 #68
Me, too, except I am almost 51. Is this happening? adigal Nov 2012 #74
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I am almost 50 years old....»Reply #2