Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Old proverb... IphengeniaBlumgarten Nov 2012 #1
Could be, but I don't think so. MineralMan Nov 2012 #2
2nd election mandate should be the reasoning for this. nt seabeyond Nov 2012 #3
Yes. I mentioned that. The President MineralMan Nov 2012 #6
kick the Bushies and their cronies out for good! librechik Nov 2012 #4
I have completely different take on this crap. 99Forever Nov 2012 #5
The head of the CIA probably doesn't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the conduct of his Romulox Nov 2012 #8
If you are ok with living in an... 99Forever Nov 2012 #10
Why oh why can't the country's TOP SPY have his privacy? Romulox Nov 2012 #11
I am quite serious. 99Forever Nov 2012 #12
You are incoherent. Your argument is risible. Maybe some CAPS will help? Romulox Nov 2012 #13
Can we move on to "Secret Wars and Selected Killings Society" Coyotl Nov 2012 #40
From what I've read MynameisBlarney Nov 2012 #27
Blackwell's (or whatever her name is) communications were NOT... 99Forever Nov 2012 #28
The problem you seem to be having here is that you're simply making up your own facts. Romulox Nov 2012 #30
Apparently, Broadwell admitted to taking the classified documents and allowed the search/seizure. Uncle Joe Nov 2012 #14
She was "embedded" with the military. She obviously doesn't have a reasonable expectation of Romulox Nov 2012 #15
Did the FBI have... 99Forever Nov 2012 #19
I don't know but warrants aren't required if you admit guilt and voluntarily allow a search. Uncle Joe Nov 2012 #23
And again I say... 99Forever Nov 2012 #24
They weren't private when she turned over her computer. Uncle Joe Nov 2012 #25
I have answered this same meme.. 99Forever Nov 2012 #32
If you or I voluntarily gave a stack of standard Post Office delivered mail that we received to Uncle Joe Nov 2012 #33
You clearly... 99Forever Nov 2012 #34
Where was this "other peoples' Private communications" that you speak of? Uncle Joe Nov 2012 #35
Nope. 99Forever Nov 2012 #37
That leaves leaves me with two premises. Uncle Joe Nov 2012 #38
You can assume any... 99Forever Nov 2012 #43
CAPS are not a SUBSTITUTE for READING THE FACTS of the CASE. The ACTUAL FACTS. Not the ones Romulox Nov 2012 #31
she asked them to look at it libodem Nov 2012 #44
Yes... 99Forever Nov 2012 #46
You may want to reach for the shelf for a new book, military law. Coyotl Nov 2012 #41
Petraeus was appointed as CIA director by Barack Obama. He isn't a "Bush holdover", any more than Romulox Nov 2012 #7
He is a Bush Neo-Con nonetheless, and probably was the DNI's pick for the job, not Obama's. Coyotl Nov 2012 #42
No it shouldn't gravity Nov 2012 #9
"Other" tledford Nov 2012 #16
I believe there is much more than an affair to this story, however Uncle Joe Nov 2012 #17
With all the demands on him Obama could have overlooked the flamingdem Nov 2012 #18
I see no reason to shitcan people like Ray LaHood. Kaleva Nov 2012 #20
Um...I'd want a housecleaning even if this story never saw the light of day... Blue_Tires Nov 2012 #21
Yes, of course. MineralMan Nov 2012 #22
Yes, they need to clear the brush of Bushes libodem Nov 2012 #26
Late, but sure, why not. n/t Egalitarian Thug Nov 2012 #29
I want to discuss this a little more libodem Nov 2012 #36
While I agree, the Petraeus Scandal is more a timely gift and reminder than a call Coyotl Nov 2012 #39
Is it usual for a military person libodem Nov 2012 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Poll: The Petraeus Affair...»Reply #29