Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mercuryblues

(14,530 posts)
11. That is my suspicion
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 10:08 AM
Nov 2012

I think Cantor kept this to himself (+ a select few) and tried to push Petraeus into fudging some info that would lead to impeaching the President. That is why the President wasn't told, nor any Democrats.

Patraeus didn't play the game so they exposed him, forcing his resignation.

Oh my. nc4bo Nov 2012 #1
Who was jackass congressman that was on with her this morning? Dawgs Nov 2012 #2
IMO the real issue is that sex is one of the traditional ways to compromise security. HereSince1628 Nov 2012 #3
Real issue imho is Cantor didn't tell Feinstein because they wanted an October Surprise trailmonkee Nov 2012 #6
That's speculative, if true it would be treason on a large scale. HereSince1628 Nov 2012 #8
my thinking is, if this would get out, the Bengahazi Lie over at Bullshit Mountain would crumble trailmonkee Nov 2012 #10
We may have to rely on The Daily Show to connect those dots... OneGrassRoot Nov 2012 #15
Unusual bongbong Nov 2012 #16
True dat. n/t OneGrassRoot Nov 2012 #17
Didn't Romney say earlier this year in the 47% video that Obama would have his Carter Moment? LiberalArkie Nov 2012 #29
the only thing speculative is what was said after the word "because" SemperEadem Nov 2012 #34
Yes, speculative but after truebluegreen Nov 2012 #35
+1 Little Star Nov 2012 #26
According to Bob Woodward, RDANGELO Nov 2012 #4
Yes sandyshoes17 Nov 2012 #7
That is my suspicion mercuryblues Nov 2012 #11
Would not surprise me in the least. Cantoris such a partisan weasel, he'd use this info Old and In the Way Nov 2012 #13
Absolutely! Look who the players are and what their agenda is. cantor is a ruthless partisan. calimary Nov 2012 #31
Bingo. nt SunSeeker Nov 2012 #24
You can always tell when Bob Woodward is lying,,,, ReRe Nov 2012 #32
So do you mean... Cracklin Charlie Nov 2012 #41
Cantor has some explaining to do. Ganja Ninja Nov 2012 #5
I think there are separate issues here Renew Deal Nov 2012 #9
It was Cantors Duty, it appears, as a member of the Intel Committee, to tell the others trailmonkee Nov 2012 #12
He was required to inform others about a leak? Renew Deal Nov 2012 #14
Gossip is what you get from TMZ. Concern is what you get from the intelligence community. R. Daneel Olivaw Nov 2012 #22
Isn't what Cantor did and didn't do here an act of treason? ananda Nov 2012 #36
Cantor was behind the leak to Woodward and Drudge, but when appacom Nov 2012 #18
Yeah. It's GOTTA be political. Just look at the players involved. Mainly eric cantor. calimary Nov 2012 #33
Revoke his clearance and kick him off of the Comm. JCMach1 Nov 2012 #19
Cantor (R) is a security risk Berlum Nov 2012 #20
+1 Historic NY Nov 2012 #38
Kick his ass off the committee for misconduct. R. Daneel Olivaw Nov 2012 #21
A very good John2 Nov 2012 #23
thanks for the reminder on all that trailmonkee Nov 2012 #25
ahh, yes that personal diary of Stephens. Given to Wolf Blitzer, I believe... KoKo Nov 2012 #28
Until the public starts screaming for his head on a platter, Cantor will be loudsue Nov 2012 #27
Until the public starts screaming for his head on a platter AlbertCat Nov 2012 #37
Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #30
Cantor is wearing a blue dress riverwalker Nov 2012 #39
You got that right. It is definitely not about an affair. underthematrix Nov 2012 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This Mornings Soledad O’B...»Reply #11