Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why we don't have to worry about Husted's Ohio idea (splitting up the EV) [View all]still_one
(91,937 posts)1. I disagree. If they want games like that then get rid of the electorial college, and do just the
Popular vote, but of course they don't want that
They were trying to do something similar, or talk about it in California
Bullshit. They are trying to fix the election in their favor, not make it fair
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why we don't have to worry about Husted's Ohio idea (splitting up the EV) [View all]
dsc
Nov 2012
OP
I disagree. If they want games like that then get rid of the electorial college, and do just the
still_one
Nov 2012
#1
that's not what Think Progress says and please don't tell me what *not* to worry about
CreekDog
Nov 2012
#28
won't the doj have to approve since ohio is now subject to oversight for irregularities? eom
ellenfl
Nov 2012
#3
i guess not . . . it's not retroactive. bummer. something needs to be done. eom
ellenfl
Nov 2012
#33
Then you may want to notify the Federal Register and tell them that they're wrong
SickOfTheOnePct
Nov 2012
#26
THey don't just want to split the EV, but to gerrymander it so they can get the majority of EV even
Faryn Balyncd
Nov 2012
#36