Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
1. Smoking "in public" is not illegal but "public places". There is a difference.
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 01:18 PM
Nov 2012

I was going to post the WA laws, but it got too long. Here is the WAC link http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=70.160

Here is a good summary.

http://www.smokefreewashington.com/laws/smokinginpublic.php

Smoking in Public Places Law

On November 8, 2005, Washingtonians made a healthy choice by voting to pass Initiative 901. The initiative prohibits smoking in all restaurants and bars by amending the state’s 1985 Clean Indoor Air Act. Today, the definition of "public place" includes bars, restaurants, bowling centers, skating rinks, and non-tribal casinos. The definition also includes private residences used to provide childcare, foster care, adult care, or similar social services, and at least 75 percent of the sleeping quarters within a hotel.

The Smoking in Public Places law also prohibits smoking within 25 feet of entrances, exits, windows that open, and ventilation intakes that serve enclosed areas where smoking is prohibited.

Washington was the tenth state in the country to implement a comprehensive statewide law prohibiting smoking in all restaurants and bars, and the fifth state to have a law that requires 100 percent of indoor workplaces to be smoke-free.
Smoking "in public" is not illegal but "public places". There is a difference. uppityperson Nov 2012 #1
I believe there are 2 cities in California which have blurred the distinction... Eleanors38 Nov 2012 #11
The ugly downside of state control of pot. dixiegrrrrl Nov 2012 #2
How do you spell "prohibition?" "T-a-x." Already big biz for cigarette smugglers. Eleanors38 Nov 2012 #12
Very similar to liquor laws in most places frazzled Nov 2012 #3
Chipping away at the edges mick063 Nov 2012 #4
Excellent points Floyd_Gondolli Nov 2012 #9
Hope so. The gerry-built RICO rationale reduced home-grown... Eleanors38 Nov 2012 #14
Add jury nullification. As more people oppose prohibition more should simply refuse sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #24
Wonder if they will irradiate the marijuana Revanchist Nov 2012 #5
I would hope at those prices that the state controlled product would be free of seeds CBGLuthier Nov 2012 #6
Shitty law TrueBlueinCO Nov 2012 #7
How is the law in Co. different than in Wa? dixiegrrrrl Nov 2012 #8
In CO, you can grow up to six plants in a locked room in your home RomneyLies Nov 2012 #15
So, legal State sales plus home grown. Best of both worlds. dixiegrrrrl Nov 2012 #17
Your law is better Floyd_Gondolli Nov 2012 #10
I hear you. Used to be two years to life in Texas before 1973... Eleanors38 Nov 2012 #16
I think the old anti-marijuana laws in Texas Mr.Bill Nov 2012 #29
Very much so. Each prohibition has its racial/cultural bogie.nt Eleanors38 Nov 2012 #36
Took my first puff in 1973..May. dixiegrrrrl Nov 2012 #18
Then you would have loved the '60s JohnnyRingo Nov 2012 #21
Funny how looking for the brown shoes still works sometimes. slampoet Nov 2012 #34
kr HiPointDem Nov 2012 #13
I can tell you Mr.Bill Nov 2012 #19
Um. We have, since 2000 Panasonic Nov 2012 #25
Is your state government growing it? Mr.Bill Nov 2012 #27
Private, I believe. There's a grower in Kirkland a few miles from my brother aletier_v Nov 2012 #28
So far, they've turned to gambling. Mr.Bill Nov 2012 #31
I'm glad the feds won't "let your state grow and sell marijuana" Eleanors38 Nov 2012 #37
Decriminalize, not legalize. JohnnyRingo Nov 2012 #20
That was always the best option, IMO. randome Nov 2012 #22
I agree liberal_at_heart Nov 2012 #39
You are allowed to grow with both laws nt Taverner Nov 2012 #23
FYI, marijuana is already legally grown in WA. aletier_v Nov 2012 #26
only if you're a medical marijuana patient liberal_at_heart Nov 2012 #38
a friendly note From the Cops,lol easychoice Nov 2012 #30
The zero tolerance and impairment limits won't pass court challenge, IMHO. kestrel91316 Nov 2012 #32
You're right - it won't pass Constituitional muster. Panasonic Nov 2012 #33
these were the reasons I voted no on it liberal_at_heart Nov 2012 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What no one is telling yo...»Reply #1