Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Today, We Would Control both Houses of Congress and the Presidency if [View all]Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)65. If you're on DU you're not "doing things", not at the same time anyway.
A lot of us have a rather proprietary attitude toward DU, we've been here a long time and seen a great deal of water pass under the bridge, it's impolite to come into a long established forum and immediately start throwing your weight around and telling everyone how they're doing it all wrong.
Try getting the feel of the place and learning some of the more common traditions here before you start with the finger pointing.
I'm trying to be nice at the moment but I'm quite capable of flaming you to shriveled lump of carbon if I want to and I can do it without getting myself in trouble with a jury.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Today, We Would Control both Houses of Congress and the Presidency if [View all]
Pryderi
Nov 2012
OP
WTF? So the agenda radically changed in the last two years from Obama's first two years?
stevenleser
Nov 2012
#11
And this changed in 2012 how? If you are claiming the President did something bad before 2010
stevenleser
Nov 2012
#30
Maybe he changed or, and I think this more likely, the clown car candidates scared people out of
Egalitarian Thug
Nov 2012
#45
I suppose you actually believe that so I'm not going to bother writing a list for you. n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Nov 2012
#71
Tim Geithner at Treasury. Rahm Emanuel & the Public Option. The escalation of Afghanistan....
Junkdrawer
Nov 2012
#21
You really believe that the additional voters that showed up were thinking that?
stevenleser
Nov 2012
#40
There is a much simpler explanation. 2008 featured the excitement of the first black President
stevenleser
Nov 2012
#41
Yeah. That worked out well. Now we are in hand to hand combat with a bunch of fucking neanderthals,
bluestate10
Nov 2012
#50
Exactly my point. If Dems had been as engaged and passionate in 2010, Repugs would NOT have been
Pryderi
Nov 2012
#9
We need to have a sustained march to take over State Houses and Governor mansions.
bluestate10
Nov 2012
#51
A national push for more people to get involved could definitely help with that.
LeftInTX
Nov 2012
#62
Yep. I've attended trainings at DFA and Camp Wellstone and was a PCP trainer for my county party
Pryderi
Nov 2012
#18
Your post is a textbook example of how some folks see what they want to see in a post.
stevenleser
Nov 2012
#12
There are a number of folks that can get behind Democratic personalities but are for TeaPubliKlan
TheKentuckian
Nov 2012
#17
That is the job of the DNC. Earlier this year I was asked to bid for a delegate spot at the
bluestate10
Nov 2012
#57
The Supreme Court is fixing to strike down The Voting Rights Act. Is that "sexy" enough?
dogknob
Nov 2012
#53
I won't come to that conclusion yet. Remember Health Care? All of us thought it was dead when
bluestate10
Nov 2012
#58
We need a DNC that does work other than collect donations. The DNC has the job is keeping
bluestate10
Nov 2012
#59