Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Does THIS Seem at all Sexist to Anyone? [View all]The Doctor.
(17,266 posts)139. Let's have some examples of this 'evading' and 'avoiding'.
Also, you have been influenced to believe I did something that I did not.
This, for instance: "if you truly were trying to "study" this phenomenon you would not bring up this old discussion from DU2"
I know this will be lost on you, but can you show me where I informed anyone of the other and still not relevant discussion on DU2?
You can't. Because I didn't.
You've also revealed that you are incapable of compartmentalizing aspects of a given discussion. You have decided that the OP is about a 'vendetta', which is only what you have been told and now believe, and are now rendered incapable of forming an objective opinion about it absent that information.
Being so easily influenced by someone to perceive something the way they want you to, without knowing anything about the depth or character of those prior exchanges besides what they tell you and having less than a handful of actual quotes to go by while concluding that there must be a 'vendetta' only proves that you are in no way 'qualified' to psychoanalyze anyone. If you don't even recognize how you are being influenced and what is going on in your own mind, you don't stand a snowball's chance in hell of figuring out what is going on in anyone else's... and definitely not mine.
If it were a 'vendetta', then you could show us some context that proves it beyond your personal opinion as arrived at through the entreaty of another.
If you were actually a psychologist with any behavioral experience, you also would not have said several of the things you did. Not the least of which would be putting someone on their 'guard' by telling them you can analyze them.
You plainly have no intention of 'analyzing' me as you are either more interested in trying to impress me ( ), or not remotely qualified to practice regardless of any worthless pieces of paper you may hold. As I've said many times and will say again: When people make it about me instead of about the subject or issue, I need no more proof that they are impotent to deal with the subject. I'd invite you to do so, but those with your sort of ego will seldom set aside their personal opinions of me in order to deal in earnest with the subject at hand. More proof you are not what you claim to be.
So please, by all means, keep every screen shot you wish in a futile effort to intimidate me, shame me, or otherwise paint me as somehow 'petty'. You will not only find the exercise disappointing, but over time you will find that I'm nothing like how you would wish to characterize me. One thing you'll find is that I tend to give the BotD to everyone until they say something rude, insulting, or condescending themselves as you have here. So take all the screenshots you wish. I already know for a fact that seabeyond gave a dishonest representation of our exchange on the other thread... then she moved the goalpost. All you'll find is that I stand by my integrity and I do not lie about others even when they lie about me... as you have been misled as well by someone. So take screenshots.
Who knows, maybe you'll actually learn a thing or two.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
153 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
because you kept telling me who and what i was instead of asking. because the reason i
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#2
and if you were being honest here, you would include the subthread, that would show how foolish
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#4
one more point. tell us honestly. that other scenario you let run? was made up. to create
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#7
yes. though he interprets to fit his agenda. and refuses to put the subthread in
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#17
as quoted, I don't think it suggests the pictures were the cause of the gender determination n/t
fishwax
Jan 2012
#6
Sometimes we can get carried away with our comments. Maybe she meant nothing by it. She just made
southernyankeebelle
Jan 2012
#12
you left out context and reality in your little scenario cause you were curious. does it matter if
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#34
fishwax posted the December thread that prompted you to create this confection.
Starry Messenger
Jan 2012
#37
i see much of it was deleted. it was going back and forth of him telling me who i am
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#38
and here i sit. but really, it isnt about me. and i am merely being overwrought. i should take
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#46
Tell me of any social 'experiment' where 'vital information' is not withheld?
The Doctor.
Jan 2012
#65
Wow, you really have no clue how experiments are run, do you? This question will prove it:
The Doctor.
Jan 2012
#73
i remember you dogmatic insistence that you KNEW why i posted the remark, regardless of asking
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#48
you didnt put all of that post in that quote. you would ask.... then you would answer
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#55
you ask, you answer in the same post. you do not need me to participate in conversation
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#78
I love watching people make all kinds of excuses for avoiding questions, challenges,
The Doctor.
Jan 2012
#141
THIS is sexist: "Is it God’s highest desire, that is, his biblically expressed will,…to have a woman
Texas Lawyer
Jan 2012
#32
The assumption that men are not interested in nature photography is absurd, but not really hurtful.
ZombieHorde
Jan 2012
#41
and if the poster had thought months prior the person had identified their gender
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#42
In the threads where I have been perceived as a woman, I never took offense.
The Doctor.
Jan 2012
#62
now, this is funny. i was playing and sing to the song while cleaning the kitchen
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#66
I think it depends on whether or not the gender assumption has a negative connotation attached to it
left coaster
Jan 2012
#72
So a poster comes in, insists it was about her, and that makes it 'flame bait'?
The Doctor.
Jan 2012
#84
So you're telepathetic? I'm impressed you know why everyone does everything.
The Doctor.
Jan 2012
#142
then i would suggest the Op not use me as an example. ask the question in a different manner
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#88
That's impossible. You have decided that anything like this I post is about you.
The Doctor.
Jan 2012
#98
i didnt read your post... just for a heads up. it is not impossible. you can come up
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#99
same as above, for heads up. i am answering the title. anything you post will get a reaction
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#111
If you didn't respond in the other thread then I can see why you would not have...
Spazito
Jan 2012
#102
He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster.
LadyHawkAZ
Jan 2012
#100
evolutionary biologists dont get near evolutionary psychology with a ten foot pole.
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#147
that is because they know it is garbage. but really, lets address the dishonesty
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#149
Women can and have been propergators of sexism. Maybe not so much as men; but there are moments.
vaberella
Jan 2012
#135