Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This was just reported on MSNBC. [View all]Frasier Balzov
(2,642 posts)28. Meanwhile, Grassley wants Garland to explain why Hunter Biden hasn't been arrested.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
169 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why wait for the facts and full story, when one can just make assumptions?
Fiendish Thingy
Mar 2023
#46
Speculation stokes the egos of those who blab. Those who know don't talk. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2023
#107
I think the investigation could go on forever unless it is adjudicated in the courts.
kentuck
Mar 2023
#9
All the investigations are moving in that direction, towards indictments and the courts.
fightforfreedom
Mar 2023
#12
Yes, grand jury is a "first stop"; it is not a place to homestead and plant crops.
Magoo48
Mar 2023
#122
That is the only way we get any real information is in the filings in the court system
Bev54
Mar 2023
#74
It's not like I'm going to flip Garland the bird in I run into him on the street
Silent3
Mar 2023
#45
Then you are proposing that DOJ deserves contempt based entirely on your feelings.
Beastly Boy
Mar 2023
#79
I'm proposing that my feelings are irrelevant to any important issue being discussed here. n/t
Silent3
Mar 2023
#81
Nobody is hurt if you are silent. But when people continually erode faith in the US government
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2023
#111
Far more prominent and important people than myself have expressed their doubts...
Silent3
Mar 2023
#133
"There is a GAP between what the DOJ has been doing and what the public knows."
Goodheart
Mar 2023
#11
"zero chance of Trump being indicted": because you are an insider and know
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2023
#112
And all those who confidently assert he'll be indicted any day now
PoindexterOglethorpe
Mar 2023
#138
"the coup won already": your only conclusion with that premise is that Biden staged a coup and won
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2023
#110
Back up, Bernardo. You twist meaning and provide illogical critique. Typical strawman "stuff"ing
jaxexpat
Mar 2023
#116
Mean what you write, jax, write what you mean. We can't read minds. Write clearly. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2023
#117
All careful, legal, righteous, successful DoJs will be slow by being careful, legal, and successful
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2023
#118
What a bunch of BS: "Garland waited almost 2 years to conduct a serious investigation"
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2023
#109
Nonsense. You are ignorant of the fact Smith inherited a sprawling ongoing investigation
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2023
#125
If the risk wasn't an existential one, I think more people wouldn't be in full panic mode
Mr. Ected
Mar 2023
#13
An existential risk is not an excuse for DOJ to circumvent the rule of law.
Beastly Boy
Mar 2023
#31
He said that based on a... MEMO written by a Nixon appointee... not a Law...
Justice matters.
Mar 2023
#140
None of these specify a sitting President cannot be prosecuted for criminal activities
Justice matters.
Mar 2023
#151
The banana republican memo should be nullified by Congress for the reasons
Justice matters.
Mar 2023
#160
Once again, I am thrilled with the prospect of getting on your ignore list.
Beastly Boy
Mar 2023
#169
Meanwhile, Grassley wants Garland to explain why Hunter Biden hasn't been arrested.
Frasier Balzov
Mar 2023
#28
So we knew on Jan. 15, 2021 that DOJ was arresting and charging unwashed Magats,
gab13by13
Mar 2023
#52
Please post a link to Garland's statement declining to investigate J6 intelligence failures.
Fiendish Thingy
Mar 2023
#72
There is only one post in this thread with an :01 time stamp this morning
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2023
#137
Part of the impatience comes from Fitzmas and Muller time. Or Eric Holder -lets move forward.
3Hotdogs
Mar 2023
#61
We know our justice system is far from perfect and we know it's not geared to investigate
yaesu
Mar 2023
#66
We get it. We just don't want a repeat in Jan 2025. mccarthy has given out the blueprint.
ecstatic
Mar 2023
#73
What? You are attacking OP's motivations, calling them a paid shill? Is it wrong to support Dems?
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2023
#106
A site that supports a Democrat "no matter what" loses credibility quite fast.
Goodheart
Mar 2023
#127
That does not apply in this thread. Why is the poster calling the OP a paid shill?
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2023
#129
You make stuff up again. Stop with the falsities. SCs are salaried positions. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2023
#130