Better to have a Special Counsel appointed by Garland - (Reply #10)

Thu Jan 12, 2023, 01:07 PM

harumph (1,510 posts)

b/c that will reduce the amount of possible politicization.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

15 replies	Author	Time	Post
This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]	Chin music	Jan 12	OP
My guess, the announcement won't have anything to do with either case.	CrispyQ	Jan 12	#1
good analogy	GenXer47	Jan 12	#2
It is risky but could work to defang the whole thing when the counsel finds nothing wrong	Thomas Hurt	Jan 12	#3
This message was self-deleted by its author	Chin music	Jan 12	#5
That is why I said "risky"	Thomas Hurt	Jan 12	#8
This message was self-deleted by its author	Chin music	Jan 12	#9
Also, wouldn't a Special Counsel sort of defang a rabid Congress looking to investigate everything?	kentuck	Jan 12	#4
This message was self-deleted by its author	Chin music	Jan 12	#6
'Many many democrats are saying...'	emulatorloo	Jan 12	#7
Better to have a Special Counsel appointed by Garland -	harumph	Jan 12	#10
It's all politics.	fightforfreedom	Jan 12	#11
Garland has already asked a Trump-appointed and still serving	Deminpenn	Jan 12	#12
This message was self-deleted by its author	Chin music	Jan 12	#13
Senators Duckworth and Durbin asked that Lausch be retained in the Biden administration.	greatauntoftriplets	Jan 12	#15
I bet they asked Tulsi Gabbard.	RandySF	Jan 12	#14

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.