Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Does anybody else agree with me that it is time . . . [View all]flying_wahini
(6,589 posts)3. I thinks it's a great idea. Just think of all the headaches we could have saved ourselves.
n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I thinks it's a great idea. Just think of all the headaches we could have saved ourselves.
flying_wahini
Nov 2012
#3
It depends on HOW much prevention and security is built in such electoral system.
Amonester
Nov 2012
#39
Not sure. What if we end up with another Bush in office. It should be some non-politicians.
Michigan Alum
Nov 2012
#19
I imagine some are much less biased than others in regards to advancing any one political agenda...
LanternWaste
Nov 2012
#57
There's a million details that won't and shouldn't be spelled out in an amendment
jeff47
Nov 2012
#55
Absolutely!!! This crap is beyond ridiculous. I hope President Obama puts this on his agenda.
Window
Nov 2012
#41
State's rights vs. Federalism, it's a very sticky problem. Perhaps imposing federal requirements
Egalitarian Thug
Nov 2012
#65
National elections should be nationally run to national standards. It's only rational. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Nov 2012
#68