Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
24. The Republican Party is now a Frankenstein movie.
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 11:25 AM
Nov 2012

They created this monster, which is now blind yet immensely angry and strong and is slowly destroying the Baron's castle that is the Repuke party. They have two choices - kill the monster before it destroys the castle completely and brings it down around their heads, or blow up the castle themselves and run like hell, hoping that they get away and the monster gets killed.

They are completely fked either way.

The 1%ers created and revved up the bigot/tealiban/fundy wackadoodle wing thinking it would somehow benefit them. Which proves the 1% ain't near as smart as we sometimes give them credit for being.

They're also losing erik satie Nov 2012 #1
And every organic farmer, a good percent of small business owners, and anyone who has lost a home slampoet Nov 2012 #13
Actually, I talked to someone while I was out canvassing yesterday Patiod Nov 2012 #21
I had a small business when Obama started. slampoet Nov 2012 #35
what LGBT person of any age or color would vote Pug this year????? lunasun Nov 2012 #14
The Log Cabin Self-Loathing Republicans Raster Nov 2012 #15
I think there is a real chance of a party split. The rigidness of the party has been helpful to them WhollyHeretic Nov 2012 #2
I am not certain it would be considered a split Horse with no Name Nov 2012 #3
What's to split?The party is now one big group of teabaggers, racists,and religious fundamentalists. AlinPA Nov 2012 #10
You forgot the greedy uber-wealthy. Teabaggers, racists, fundies and greedy. KittyWampus Nov 2012 #17
Correct. I don't see them splitting because they need each other. AlinPA Nov 2012 #30
The civil war has been low intensity nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #4
Did Koch fund Larouche? n/t Horse with no Name Nov 2012 #7
Yup, very early on. nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #12
I don't know why this doesn't surprise me Horse with no Name Nov 2012 #16
All the way back to the plot against FDR nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #18
A profound observation malaise Nov 2012 #9
It will come down to a battle of the Numbers Clique versus the We Don't Need No Damn Numbers Clique. grantcart Nov 2012 #5
The first shot was Christie, last week alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #6
There are not enough "moderates" in the GOP to fill up a Boeing-737. AlinPA Nov 2012 #11
Believe me, they are not too far from GitRDun Nov 2012 #8
I went to a baby shower that had an old white racist grandmother there Horse with no Name Nov 2012 #20
AWESOME! GitRDun Nov 2012 #25
I think Graham realizes that if his "party" continues on this course justiceischeap Nov 2012 #19
Just Curious - Has The Repug Party Worked To Help Teabaggers Or Have They Just Given Them.... global1 Nov 2012 #22
The preemptive pissing and moaning begins. It will be non-stop for days. lpbk2713 Nov 2012 #23
The Republican Party is now a Frankenstein movie. hifiguy Nov 2012 #24
Above post = homerun mick063 Nov 2012 #26
They're not smart. Most of them were born on third base. WilliamPitt Nov 2012 #29
Lindsey Graham is going to go nuts Enrique Nov 2012 #27
something wicked this way comes, according to Fineman grasswire Nov 2012 #28
Gramham not well liked by rethugs Budee Nov 2012 #31
They can secede. Everyone with a heart and at least half a brain will be ecstatic if they do. Zorra Nov 2012 #32
I've got a loaded clip for my 20 gauge shotgun. HopeHoops Nov 2012 #33
I totally expect them to think it's because of insufficient conservatism Posteritatis Nov 2012 #34
Jesus - well Lindsey Graham isn't really representative of the tea party base el_bryanto Nov 2012 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Romney loses, count th...»Reply #24