Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
interesting! k&r Whisp Nov 2012 #1
Umm..well.. barnabas63 Nov 2012 #2
+1 Old and In the Way Nov 2012 #4
There's really no excuse! barnabas63 Nov 2012 #5
We must've read the same books... a la izquierda Nov 2012 #17
Were you in grade school in the 70s? nt barnabas63 Nov 2012 #20
No,in the 80s nt a la izquierda Nov 2012 #22
Same here as a kid in the early '70s when we were told BumRushDaShow Nov 2012 #21
While I agree that warming is a factor, that area has flooded in the past Bluenorthwest Nov 2012 #6
Still....expanding an island with trash and dirt is a pretty ridiculous idea. cbdo2007 Nov 2012 #7
the most expensive neighborhood in Chicago (Streeterville) was built on trash landfill waddirum Nov 2012 #18
1821 - "Manhattan Island was completely flooded to Canal Street" PoliticAverse Nov 2012 #8
How is that possible? barnabas63 Nov 2012 #9
As far as I know it was 13' since 1821 which Sandy exceeded slightly. n/t PoliticAverse Nov 2012 #12
Mean sea level is about a foot higher in NYC than it was in 1821 slackmaster Nov 2012 #14
Indeed sea level at The Battery has been slowly rising... PoliticAverse Nov 2012 #16
Thanks.... barnabas63 Nov 2012 #19
The next one won't take 190 years to arrive. cprise Nov 2012 #23
+1 Wind Dancer Nov 2012 #24
Carter was correct malaise Nov 2012 #10
That's how NYC grew oh, 100 or more years ago. RoccoR5955 Nov 2012 #3
That's pretty fascinating. BumRushDaShow Nov 2012 #11
History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men slackmaster Nov 2012 #13
Explains a lot about fighting nature. nt scrubthedata Nov 2012 #15
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»1776 map of Manhattan vs ...»Reply #10