General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: All 150,000 members of this site should be flooding MSM and the DOJ with [View all]IDoMath
(404 posts)I might suggest that conservatives are much more likely to follow a herd mentality. As they see people gathering around a winner they are more heavily influenced by the size of the existing crowd when they make their choices. In dense areas, this might present itself as the number of campaign signs showing for a particular candidate. At some point there might be a kind of 'critical mass' that accelerates this effect, thus, in dense areas you will see a tendency for the graph to tip upward for the winner and downward for the loser.
BUT Dunniho has given us something of great value and I can foresee the possibility that he could merit the Nobel Peace Prize. If he continues his work and refines it with the feedback he is getting, his work might one day be of use to election watchers to detect electoral fraud around the world. And THAT would be worth a Nobel Peace Prize in my mind. Even if he is not detecting fraud now, he is laying the groundwork for how it would be found.