Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: NPR just flat out LIED. [View all]

Response to garybeck (Original post)

NPR just flat out LIED. [View all] garybeck Jan 2012 OP
give Panetta some time Demonaut Jan 2012 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Jan 2012 #2
Do you mean the republicans that threatened to de-fund NPR if they didn't get their ass in line? tularetom Jan 2012 #4
I agree. MedicalAdmin Jan 2012 #14
Oh come on NPR talks to two parties on every issue hootinholler Jan 2012 #22
Democrats are Yurupeans and they sure aren't our allies. /nt Saving Hawaii Jan 2012 #34
Which DUer first coined "Now Primarily Republican"? Fire Walk With Me Jan 2012 #3
It's called splitting hairs finer than atoms. The npr story says "program", Panetta says "weapons" leveymg Jan 2012 #5
Reminds me of "weapons of mass destruction-related program activities" n/t arcane1 Jan 2012 #6
I don't really agree with that garybeck Jan 2012 #11
Completely agree. n/t RiffRandell Jan 2012 #7
Iran is essential to the PNAC/neocon plan... CoffeeCat Jan 2012 #8
Hat tip for that reminder. dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #38
you are right, of course. the PNAC types are vampires to the core of their being. marasinghe Jan 2012 #47
Why does anyone still give NPR any credibility? abelenkpe Jan 2012 #9
as bad as they are, there is little else Over the air rurallib Jan 2012 #10
That actually sounds quite entertaining! :) nt abelenkpe Jan 2012 #45
they still are seen by many as liberal/objective. not that I agree. n/t garybeck Jan 2012 #13
Good point, why does anybody give any MSM any credibility? just1voice Jan 2012 #16
JUST LIKE THE SADDAM dodge. He was dev. a weapons PROGRAM. NOT WEAPONS. WingDinger Jan 2012 #12
You're either on the bus or off the bus. garybeck Jan 2012 #18
They've been doing this for years. redqueen Jan 2012 #15
the scary thing about NPR is garybeck Jan 2012 #19
+1000 dead on. corkhead Jan 2012 #31
So liberals can't distinguish between what they know is bs on FOX and NPR's rw propaganda? SammyWinstonJack Jan 2012 #42
NPR took a hard turn to the right during Stupid's administration Warpy Jan 2012 #17
NPR..lies too..sad..but true..nt K and R Stuart G Jan 2012 #20
I don't agree with al these attacks on NPR. greiner3 Jan 2012 #21
Uh, I'm not attacking NPR altogether. And are you saying that if they lie garybeck Jan 2012 #25
sorry; running decent arts programs on NPR & PBS, doesn't make 'em into objective news sources. marasinghe Jan 2012 #48
I gave up on them in 2004 The Genealogist Jan 2012 #23
Technically, Panetta doesn't speak for all the "allies" zipplewrath Jan 2012 #24
he speaks for the department of defense. garybeck Jan 2012 #26
And I don't think so zipplewrath Jan 2012 #28
Iran wants nuclear power... hunter Jan 2012 #27
Iran has very little uranium, though. North Korea at least has millions of tonnes of reserves. joshcryer Jan 2012 #37
NPR gets about 2% funding from US, and that's about how much of them you can believe. Festivito Jan 2012 #29
National Propaganda Radio. Odin2005 Jan 2012 #30
Panetta: Iran is seeking capability to build nuclear weapon oberliner Jan 2012 #32
Washington Post just lied. AtheistCrusader Jan 2012 #35
NPR has been a part of the propaganda network for the better part of a decade TheKentuckian Jan 2012 #33
Deja Vu, Anyone? chervilant Jan 2012 #36
While I'm no fan of NPR.. sendero Jan 2012 #39
why would Panetta lie about this? do you know more than he does? garybeck Jan 2012 #40
His own words. sendero Jan 2012 #46
K&R! liam_laddie Jan 2012 #41
And the sky is blue. NPR has been National Propaganda Radio for years. McCamy Taylor Jan 2012 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author Mosby Jan 2012 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NPR just flat out LIED.»Reply #44