Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Confused [View all]
Confused [View all] Wildcat1955 Oct 2012 OP
How many unwanted children have you adopted? sadbear Oct 2012 #1
Wanting mothers to CHOOSE life is not radical. kalli007 Oct 2012 #2
Exactly 1gobluedem Oct 2012 #5
+1 ProudProgressiveNow Oct 2012 #16
kalli007 is correct GitRDun Oct 2012 #54
Except that "prohibition with exceptions" precludes choice. n/t Egalitarian Thug Oct 2012 #57
Ok. What has that got to do with this conversation? renie408 Oct 2012 #118
Yes. In the thread that instigated this one. n/t Egalitarian Thug Oct 2012 #126
THIS right here. Chorophyll Oct 2012 #91
What she said x's 100. renie408 Oct 2012 #117
A woman is not a mother until she has given birth (or adopted) REP Oct 2012 #123
My answer get the red out Oct 2012 #3
Do you believe... mcranor Oct 2012 #4
You want to impose your beliefs and their consequences on others. immoderate Oct 2012 #6
Because some not all believe you should believe what they believe !!!!!! chille1 Oct 2012 #7
It is a volatile issue. Don't expect people to embrace a position that makes no sense. bluerum Oct 2012 #8
So all women who get knocked up have not the means to support a child? i was a cathar. Oct 2012 #125
As a rape crisis advocate and women's shelter volunteer, I can say for some it IS "no biggie" riderinthestorm Oct 2012 #127
Ooookay. Have a good one. Snowflake. bluerum Oct 2012 #128
So what you're saying is that you are pro choice. n/t ornotna Oct 2012 #9
Just want to add - you're anti-choice. Saying you're pro-life justiceischeap Oct 2012 #10
If you do not want to get an abortion Dyedinthewoolliberal Oct 2012 #11
Yes, you appear to be quite confused. Viking12 Oct 2012 #12
Don't care what you believe, or what you practice. Just don't TwilightGardener Oct 2012 #13
+1 Liberalynn Oct 2012 #46
+1000. nm nc4bo Oct 2012 #130
Well I'm confused too OldHippieChick Oct 2012 #14
Volitional pro-birth Wildcat1955 Oct 2012 #21
The left does not have a bias for "death", nor are they less favorable towards "birth" riderinthestorm Oct 2012 #29
"do this in a non-coercive manner that respects individual freedom" What laws re abortion do you uppityperson Oct 2012 #43
I have a question for you. I don't know if you are male or female, but tell me what you sinkingfeeling Oct 2012 #15
I understand Wildcat1955 Oct 2012 #23
And this is what pro-choice is all about. n/t Fla Dem Oct 2012 #67
So you're pro-choice. (nt) skinnertest Oct 2012 #69
It sounds like you may have "looked at it in purely medical terms" Mariana Oct 2012 #28
+1 Iris Oct 2012 #73
Perhaps you missed my reply asking you to define some terms to make it easier to discuss this. uppityperson Oct 2012 #17
Pro-birth Wildcat1955 Oct 2012 #30
Is the opposite a bias in favor of...death? That is insulting most everyone but a few sociopaths uppityperson Oct 2012 #36
She just did say that in Post #21. ALL Dems are biased towards "death" riderinthestorm Oct 2012 #40
Absolutely not! Wildcat1955 Oct 2012 #49
There are lots of organizations that offer women support marions ghost Oct 2012 #52
To clarify, sorry, you don't want to make abortions legally unavailable? Be coerced into not being uppityperson Oct 2012 #53
Don't like abortions? Horse with no Name Oct 2012 #18
That sums it up for me! hamsterjill Oct 2012 #27
+1000. nt Javaman Oct 2012 #70
You were condescending toward women. Mariana Oct 2012 #19
This. ceile Oct 2012 #20
No Wildcat1955 Oct 2012 #32
Your own words misrepresent what you believe? Viking12 Oct 2012 #37
That's a direct copy of your other post! And you've just re-stated the exact same thing here! riderinthestorm Oct 2012 #39
So now women aren't intelligent Mariana Oct 2012 #80
Don't you have enough on your own plate? Seriously. Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #86
damn, what Warren said Herlong Oct 2012 #97
Agreed. Iris Oct 2012 #75
Condescending ... and wrong REP Oct 2012 #78
Excellent post... Spazito Oct 2012 #87
I haven't updated it for a while; there's probably even more data negating his "concerns" REP Oct 2012 #124
Your view deserves respect Onlooker Oct 2012 #22
Onlooker Wildcat1955 Oct 2012 #33
No Problem Here....but WiffenPoof Oct 2012 #24
"pro" and "anti" lables just dumb down the discourse BarackTheVote Oct 2012 #25
+1 freshwest Oct 2012 #101
Did you know married women also have abortions? Not just single mothers? uppityperson Oct 2012 #104
I am aware of that, which is why I said: BarackTheVote Oct 2012 #111
"Pro-birth"? Spazito Oct 2012 #26
Not at all Wildcat1955 Oct 2012 #35
In reading your posts, it does come across as wanting to "coerce"... Spazito Oct 2012 #48
Spiritual??? KatyMan Oct 2012 #31
Spiritual advice Wildcat1955 Oct 2012 #38
So you are not advocating limiting abortions legally. Thank you for making that clear. uppityperson Oct 2012 #105
Thank you. Maybe a man's opinion will actually count for something. Iris Oct 2012 #74
Your position implies that legal coercion of a person's body is just. That's the problem I see. Egalitarian Thug Oct 2012 #34
What? Wildcat1955 Oct 2012 #42
From just your first reply; "but as an issue ethical concerns are paramount" Egalitarian Thug Oct 2012 #55
So no response to your own words? Do you really imagine that those of us Egalitarian Thug Oct 2012 #115
I don't understand your position gollygee Oct 2012 #41
Amen! Wildcat1955 Oct 2012 #44
What laws do you support regarding abortions? uppityperson Oct 2012 #45
You say you believe in "prohibition with exceptions" what does that mean? WhollyHeretic Oct 2012 #47
Reply to #47 Wildcat1955 Oct 2012 #56
China has universal health care, free birth control and sterilizations - a family planner's dream! riderinthestorm Oct 2012 #58
I know A LOT of people Horse with no Name Oct 2012 #59
What she said n/t KatyMan Oct 2012 #62
I was trying to be nice and give the poster some time to edit riderinthestorm Oct 2012 #63
You can always count on me to not be subtle,lol n/t Horse with no Name Oct 2012 #64
Thank you. n/t Iris Oct 2012 #76
I know women who had abortions for birth control. I mean, they all did, right? Abortion = no child? uppityperson Oct 2012 #106
Prohibit: to forbid by authority or law Viking12 Oct 2012 #66
What I would say has already been well said in this thread marions ghost Oct 2012 #50
I think progressives should be able to tolerate differences of opinion treestar Oct 2012 #51
Thanks tree star Wildcat1955 Oct 2012 #65
Let's see... billh58 Oct 2012 #107
Post removed Post removed Oct 2012 #109
Whatever? billh58 Oct 2012 #120
Gotten enough attention, yet? Or will you be starting a third thread to discuss yourself? Indpndnt Oct 2012 #60
Turn the channel Wildcat1955 Oct 2012 #68
The Channel Will Be Turned Soon Dear HangOnKids Oct 2012 #72
This thread was a waste of our time GitRDun Oct 2012 #61
I'm sorry Wildcat1955 Oct 2012 #71
So how many children have you adopted? jeff47 Oct 2012 #79
This is where it goes off the rails GitRDun Oct 2012 #81
Assist Wildcat1955 Oct 2012 #82
You asked why people get aggravated with you. Well your last response is why... GitRDun Oct 2012 #83
And you honestly think that anyone here is opposed to prenatal care? Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #96
Have you ever thought of having a pro humanity stance Herlong Oct 2012 #92
I'd like to know the specific paramaters of this "Culture of life" you think we should have Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #99
You're message would never be confused on FreeRepublic Herlong Oct 2012 #103
I have no problem with your views. . . BigDemVoter Oct 2012 #77
Take this to Meta. Actually, just take it elsewhere. morningfog Oct 2012 #84
I suspect the "hostility" comes from that fact that some in this country want to outlaw abortion. Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #85
Correction Wildcat1955 Oct 2012 #88
Effective for or at what? Iris Oct 2012 #90
Therefore you can see humanity Herlong Oct 2012 #93
Intrinsic value and worth to the fetus, Herlong Oct 2012 #100
Okay, bye bye, see ya and go fuck yourself. Arugula Latte Oct 2012 #132
Because that attitude is not progressive, no matter what the alleged pro-lifers claim: freshwest Oct 2012 #89
Just curious Herlong Oct 2012 #94
"pro-birth position"? cute. you mean FORCED birth. nt seabeyond Oct 2012 #95
Yes, you ARE confused, WinkyDink Oct 2012 #98
Or baiting us here for friends elsewhere. freshwest Oct 2012 #102
By starting multiple threads on the same topic. Indpndnt Oct 2012 #108
Good grief Wildcat1955 Oct 2012 #110
Really? Interesting. Indpndnt Oct 2012 #112
Veracity Wildcat1955 Oct 2012 #114
Then this thread does belong in meta. Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #122
You never know. freshwest Oct 2012 #113
Because there are as many knee jerkers that are liberals as there are conservatives. renie408 Oct 2012 #116
Bigotry tends to draw hostility. Starry Messenger Oct 2012 #119
You are too old to have a dog in this fight Generic Other Oct 2012 #121
Let me explain my position on this... Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2012 #129
Are you advocating for outlawing abortion? If so, you can go fuck yourself. Arugula Latte Oct 2012 #131
Confusion could be your epitaph... Ellipsis Oct 2012 #133
"I fail to understand how wanting mothers to chose life is radical" liberal_at_heart Oct 2012 #134
Do you think abortion should be legal? Yes/No? Logical Oct 2012 #135
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Confused»Reply #33