Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
16. Have you seen the great work by http://protect.org/
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 10:31 PM
Jan 2012
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/trish-kinney/the-politics-of-child-pro_b_1171373.html

The Politics of Child Protection Led by a Motley Pirate Ship of Pissed Off People

Posted: 12/27/11 03:41 PM ET by Trish Kinney


To understand the mission set forth in the website http://protect.org/ one need only spend an hour or so with Grier Weeks, Executive Director of the National Association to Protect Children. Ask him how we got where he is and he will tell you that after 20 years of working on political campaigns, he became increasingly upset with every election cycle that no one seemed to care about fighting for kids. He reviewed a national manual on registered Political Action Committees, as thick as the New York yellow pages, and not one involved the protection of children. Weeks has no personal experience with the work to which he now devotes his life, but he once began making a list of family members and friends whose lives had been impacted by abuse. When the list got too long, he quit counting. His anger continued to simmer.

In 2001 Weeks met Andrew Vachss, a well credentialed attorney/author with a specialty in child protection. Vachss commented that if we had an NRA for kids, everything would change. And Protect was born. Organized as a 501©4, a non-profit single-issue social welfare organization, Protect works hand in hand with the National Association to Protect Children, a 501©3 charitable organization. Their mutual mainstream bi-partisan agenda is reflected in their common website, protect.org. Weeks has equal disdain for Republicans and Democrats who flat out refuse to stand up for kids waiting to be rescued from abuse, violence, and sex trafficking. He is fond of saying that when the house is burning down, you don't stop at the gate and interview the firefighters about their position on the issues, you put the fire out. He just wants politicians to take action.

Protect meets with elected officials to show them absolute proof of the horrific things taking place in their own districts. Promising to make them the conquering hero for interrupting these terrible crimes in progress, they still walk away. He continues to ask the smartest people he knows how this can be but so far has no answers he can accept. There are so many victims now that child abuse is no longer an aberration, it is the norm. Why aren't we all outraged? If law enforcement technology can tell us where these diabolical perpetrators are, why aren't we rushing out to get them? Weeks just can't make his peace with this shocking, even catastrophic social injustice.

Liberals who profess to be advocates for human rights and domestic violence are "criminally silent on this issue, almost complicit," says Weeks. "They are hopelessly conflicted as to issues that should be black and white." When confronted with child pornography on the internet and video, talk turns to first amendment rights and the sanctity of the internet. Child trafficking that takes place in Nepal or Thailand is a clear evil to them. But when a child is trafficked in Kansas or Chicago, they stay silent. It is "unforgiveable, despicable" and forces the conclusion that liberals cannot be taken seriously on anything they have to say on human rights. Weeks is "enormously frustrated."

More at link.

http://www.centredaily.com/2011/12/11/3016401/abuse-images-database-bigger-scandal.html#ixzz1gEuDvmoe

Abuse images database bigger scandal for state

By Grier Weeks
Posted: 12:01am on Dec 11, 2011

GOOD! William769 Jan 2012 #1
very good work! limpyhobbler Jan 2012 #2
Excellent! Laurian Jan 2012 #3
Should probably have included the "CHILD" part in the headline Prophet 451 Jan 2012 #4
"4. Should probably have included the "CHILD" part in the headline" greiner3 Jan 2012 #21
Good Point ihavenobias Jan 2012 #25
Seriously, I was about to say: "Now they've gone too far!" EOTE Jan 2012 #27
Agree. Reading the headline I just thought "why??" - but this is GOOD! nt gateley Jan 2012 #30
I wish there would be a follow-up story on how many pop up after justiceischeap Jan 2012 #5
Have you seen the great work by http://protect.org/ proverbialwisdom Jan 2012 #16
Why can't law enforcement agencies do the same thing? Canuckistanian Jan 2012 #6
Interesting question treestar Jan 2012 #8
... LadyHawkAZ Jan 2012 #11
it would be interesting to see who the clients are notadmblnd Jan 2012 #7
Here's a website where you can meet the clients. Kablooie Jan 2012 #18
oh, you mean illegal stuff involving non-adults. Warren DeMontague Jan 2012 #9
they are my heroes roguevalley Jan 2012 #10
NOW they've done it! xfundy Jan 2012 #12
Like I said, anyone who thinks anonymous is "anti-porn", has never been to 4chan. Warren DeMontague Jan 2012 #20
Two BIG thumbs up Raine Jan 2012 #13
Standing Ovation for ANONYMOUS! BlancheSplanchnik Jan 2012 #14
Well done, Anonymous! Spazito Jan 2012 #15
Excellent. Amazing why the govt won't do this. nt valerief Jan 2012 #17
The authorities can't do it the way Anonymous does because it would taint the evidence Occulus Jan 2012 #22
I think you hit the nail on the head, there. nt MADem Jan 2012 #24
5200 Pentagon Employees Purchased Child Pornography - Pentagon will still Not respond to Congress Poll_Blind Jan 2012 #19
you'd think the DOJ might take an interest in this eShirl Jan 2012 #23
Well done! (nt) Kellerfeller Jan 2012 #26
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jan 2012 #28
Salute! quinnox Jan 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hacker Group Anonymous Ta...»Reply #16