General Discussion

mitch96

(13,895 posts)

26. Between you, me and the gate post I think the DOJ isn't gonna nail TFG, SDNY will.

Sat Dec 18, 2021, 11:31 AM

Dec 2021

I believe the DOJ does not want to set a precedent on nailing the President. I think they will nail everyone AROUND 45 and let the SDNY take down is criminal organization and nail HIM as a criminal... ymmv
I can dream can't I?
m

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

52 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Yes, Chuck Rosenberg just said it on Rachel, [View all] gab13by13 Dec 2021 OP

Chuck Rosenberg will get the attention of his peers. OAITW r.2.0 Dec 2021 #1

Good point, gab13by13 Dec 2021 #2

So Matt Miller and Rosenberg both say DOJ is doing nothing? dem4decades Dec 2021 #3

Think House Committee should continue leading investigation into Hoyt Dec 2021 #4

Rosenberg sees it differently. gab13by13 Dec 2021 #5

Rosenberg told us Mueller could handle the job too. And don't think Hoyt Dec 2021 #10

I think he was also one who cilla4progress Dec 2021 #18

That's true. Had forgotten about that. Hoyt Dec 2021 #28

True Joinfortmill Dec 2021 #46

I also think that with all the insurrectionists Mr.Bill Dec 2021 #36

👍 Joinfortmill Dec 2021 #45

Damn. You know it's a 20 alarm fire when even Rosenberg is sounding the alarm ecstatic Dec 2021 #6

No no nope it's not that the d.o.j. isnt doing anything is just that we dont understand Fullduplexxx Dec 2021 #7

Seen that screen play and it never works like that...There are no trick endings in the DOJ handbook. Ford_Prefect Dec 2021 #8

Yes, we are in the middle of "Waiting for Godot" while our hopes go unrealized by the DOJ. Lonestarblue Dec 2021 #39

Between you, me and the gate post I think the DOJ isn't gonna nail TFG, SDNY will. mitch96 Dec 2021 #26

I think you're correct I also think that the right wont let that stand in their way with their doj Fullduplexxx Dec 2021 #27

Quite possible. Joinfortmill Dec 2021 #44

So . . . AverageOldGuy Dec 2021 #9

Oh it's political...Most of the GOP failed at a coup that was Bluethroughu Dec 2021 #16

The decision not to prosecute is as political as a decision to prosecute. Poiuyt Dec 2021 #17

Tbe decision NOT to investigate would be the political move lame54 Dec 2021 #29

So why is DOJ 'not' investigating? I'm confused. flying_wahini Dec 2021 #11

Adam Schiff says the same thing. Grasswire2 Dec 2021 #14

merrick garland? the man who looked the other way orleans Dec 2021 #12

I think of the video of the day..... MyOwnPeace Dec 2021 #13

Back to the status quo of letting republicans get away with whatever they want. CentralMass Dec 2021 #21

dems ignoring the fact that trump has 1500 radio stations to attack garland and certainot Dec 2021 #15

+1000 nt doubleplusgood Dec 2021 #22

We shouldn't prosecute an attempted coup because conservative radio exists? Scrivener7 Dec 2021 #23

rw radio has been intimidating politicians, media, officials, citizens, jurys, judges and now certainot Dec 2021 #24

He knew about the existence of conservative radio when he took the job. Scrivener7 Dec 2021 #30

that's not what i'm talking about. the fact is few know where a lot of that buzz comes from and certainot Dec 2021 #32

DU's message police have repeatedly assured me that The System is working Orrex Dec 2021 #19

And the weird thing is that I know the ones who are left pushing that are not trolls. Scrivener7 Dec 2021 #31

I like that assessment Orrex Dec 2021 #51

That's not what I heard Rosenberg say. Fiendish Thingy Dec 2021 #20

The problem is search warrants and subpoenas are not being issued questionseverything Dec 2021 #38

👍 Joinfortmill Dec 2021 #43

The longer this drags on the more I fear they are going to miss getting tfg convicted BSdetect Dec 2021 #25

Thanks for sharing. berni_mccoy Dec 2021 #33

So who would be a better AG to drive the DOJ to investigate? Any ideas? ancianita Dec 2021 #34

I supported Preet Bharara. Lonestarblue Dec 2021 #40

Yup. Preet would've been an excellent choice. nt DLevine Dec 2021 #50

Sally Yates, Mr.Bill Dec 2021 #48

I still think llashram Dec 2021 #35

I'm with you. Joinfortmill Dec 2021 #42

Ok maybe Garland is waiting for something. Meanwhile he could/should assure Biden or somebody housecat Dec 2021 #37

I would never presume to argue with Chuck Rosenberg, but Joinfortmill Dec 2021 #41

I fear DOJ is hamstrung by 45 sympathizers and a weak AG. May time prove me wrong. Please. Evolve Dammit Dec 2021 #47

I have gathered all the info i can find. old guy Dec 2021 #49

I know that same feeling, and I can't stand it Ohioboy Dec 2021 #52