Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A Well Regulated Militia [View all]NickB79
(19,224 posts)68. So Americans don't have an individual right to free speech, or free religion?
So in this portion:
right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government
If I as an individual wanted to petition the Government, on my own, I have no right to do so? I can only petition as part of a group?
Cornell Law clearly says it protects individual rights.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/first_amendment
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
To me it was always that to have a well regulate militia, the people have to be allowed to own guns.
brewens
Oct 2021
#7
A pretty small percentage of people owned guns in the first place in the Colonies. Take away that
brewens
Oct 2021
#30
to me its crystal clear - which is why we need to erase it from our constitution
Blues Heron
Oct 2021
#20
The quote is a clause, not a sentence, and it's deliberately removed from its context.
lagomorph777
Oct 2021
#63
You Are Refering To Individual State Constitutions At The Founding, Sir?
The Magistrate
Oct 2021
#48
The term "well regulated" can cover many things, including what types of firearms are regulation. So
dameatball
Oct 2021
#3
They probably should have said that we can own guns for the purpose of serving in a well
brewens
Oct 2021
#10
I contend that morons allowed open carry does not qualify as a "well regulated militia".
pecosbob
Oct 2021
#32
No - it's written as it's written. I don't have to defend the Founders here.
lagomorph777
Oct 2021
#71
The 2nd covers guns expected to be used by the militia - i.e. uniform military-grade arms.
BusterMove
Oct 2021
#36
From Scholar Carol Anderson: "a constitutional right to form militias to put down slave revolts"
usonian
Oct 2021
#37
Anderson isn't wrong about one of the southern state motivation, but she ignores the fact..
SYFROYH
Oct 2021
#59
Yup. But gun-humpers (even here) will give you all kinds of excuses to ignore the first clause.
lagomorph777
Oct 2021
#62