Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Carville-I don't think this man (Merrick Garland) knows whether to wind his ass or scratch his watch [View all]Bettie
(16,076 posts)32. The rule of law only applies
if everyone acknowledges that the laws apply to them.
One side has decided that laws (also rules and norms) don't apply to them and by all appearances Garland agrees.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Carville-I don't think this man (Merrick Garland) knows whether to wind his ass or scratch his watch [View all]
Celerity
Oct 2021
OP
Completely agree - he's a milquetoast and should be replaced. I've seen nothing concrete
kysrsoze
Oct 2021
#1
Hmm, should I trust President Biden's judgement or that of impatient bloggers?
brooklynite
Oct 2021
#12
Pres Biden should make First Lady/Senator/Sec of State HILLARY CLINTON the AG !!!!!
Trueblue1968
Oct 2021
#48
Our ag Mr Soggy Whitebread is hard at work .. things take time ... he's got a lot on his plate
Fullduplexxx
Oct 2021
#3
At some point soon that dog won't hunt, he is now 7+ months on the job and has thousands
Celerity
Oct 2021
#6
I think the post you are responding to is sarcasm and the poster agrees with you.
Scrivener7
Oct 2021
#58
I was hoping for some action .. mueller handed garland 10 counts of obstruction and what we're
Fullduplexxx
Oct 2021
#71
I'll bet every DUer also has a pretty good idea if the political and judicial implications.
usaf-vet
Oct 2021
#29
We've survived plenty of bad. Admittedly, trump was a true test. But he's gone, but not quietly.
Hoyt
Oct 2021
#59
I'm simply saying that one does not need to be an insider to see what needs to be done.
hadEnuf
Oct 2021
#68
I have not been his biggest fangirl in the past, BUT I listened to the whole segment before I posted
Celerity
Oct 2021
#10
And if you never get more evidence, will you always believe he is doing something?
Scrivener7
Oct 2021
#55
If you never get more evidence, will you always believe he is doing something?
Scrivener7
Oct 2021
#63
So if, three years from now, he has done nothing, then you will believe he is doing nothing?
Scrivener7
Oct 2021
#73
When (and I say that because the incumbent party usually does) all this jan 6th investigation
Fullduplexxx
Oct 2021
#86
Sad thing is that his measured cautious approach would have been really good for the SC.
Scrivener7
Oct 2021
#54
I don't want to be saying the old adaged in 2022 and 2024,! Would have, could have, SHOULD have.
usaf-vet
Oct 2021
#75
IMO, democratic turnout next year will depend a lot on what the DOJ does or doesn't do.
CrispyQ
Oct 2021
#21
I agree - none of the redacted materials, such as the mueller report have been released
samsingh
Oct 2021
#26
Or the mechanisms documented in the Panama Papers or the Pandora Papers? Which are not figments.
Scrivener7
Oct 2021
#52
The other thing about the Pandora Papers and the Panama Papers that I find terrifying is
Scrivener7
Oct 2021
#82
If he was all over this, like some here insist, we would have seen something. There would
Scrivener7
Oct 2021
#51