Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Osama bin Laden will never walk on this earth again" is the rhetoric we want to represent us? [View all]snooper2
(30,151 posts)66. First off, their is no such thing as a soul, but to go ahead and continue your thought process...
I have 0 regrets or frets about killing that POS...
I also have no problem with the ongoing killing of fundie fucks who enjoy killing girls who just want to go to school.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Osama bin Laden will never walk on this earth again" is the rhetoric we want to represent us? [View all]
Bonobo
Jan 2012
OP
The 2 principal war criminals won't have to come to trial and I'm very happy they are out of the way
phleshdef
Jan 2012
#10
I said Truman's statement was an example of a Democrat using the same kind of rhetoric.
phleshdef
Jan 2012
#35
The circuit board is impeached by one person. Other evidence shows that Libya had possession
Bolo Boffin
Jan 2012
#60
Edwin Bollier? The guy who also claimed Gaddafi offered him $200M to get Megrahi free?
Bolo Boffin
Jan 2012
#72
Really? I've been proven wrong? I'm not noticing a lot of responses to my #94.
Bolo Boffin
Jan 2012
#107
JackRiddler I used to think Megrahi did bomb the plane, but your logic and facts are solid.
Zalatix
Jan 2012
#64
" Libya was framed for the Lockerbie bombing is MSM sourced" Gross overstatement
Bolo Boffin
Jan 2012
#61
Who in the world releases someone who kills 300 people for "Compassion" reasons? Really?
Zalatix
Jan 2012
#68
And despite all this overwhelming evidence, a re-trial was planned for him. How do you explain that?
Zalatix
Jan 2012
#82
Because the defense wasn't told about the CIA offer to Gauci. A technicality.
Bolo Boffin
Jan 2012
#84
Apples & Oranges. Ted Stevens was accused of political corruption, not terrorism/mass murder.
Zalatix
Jan 2012
#90
Don't you know? He had OVERWHELMING evidence against him. Yet a re-trial was approved.
Zalatix
Jan 2012
#83
You know, when you put it in ALLCAPS like that, it feels more overwhelming!
JackRiddler
Jan 2012
#88
Here's another good point - the actual summary of referral from the Scottish review board
Bolo Boffin
Jan 2012
#94
US or international politics of it all aside, bin Laden's demise was bluntly necessary, imo.
pinto
Jan 2012
#12
Bluntly necessary? To shoot rather than capture the best source of intelligence?
JackRiddler
Jan 2012
#55
If osama truly was the criminal mastermind behind deaths of thousands and thousands of innocents
Muskypundit
Jan 2012
#14
Personally, I'm glad that particular shithead is dead. If that makes me a bad man, I'm a bad man.
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2012
#21
This is the first I've heard of this particular statement by the President
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2012
#25
I considered the capture or killing of Bin Laden as a worthy goal of our government.
MilesColtrane
Jan 2012
#27
Right up there with Americans screaming, USA! USA!, teeth clenched and veins
truth2power
Jan 2012
#41
Don't like that phrase, but winning the war against terrorism sounds pretty good...
JCMach1
Jan 2012
#46
Just run Gingrich as a (D)--if we are EXACTLY like them, they won't be able to criticize us!
Romulox
Jan 2012
#57
Not if Gingrich (D) is the nominee, as I suggested earlier. How could they criticize ANYTHING,
Romulox
Jan 2012
#104
Yep! He was directly responsible for ordering the deaths of thousands of people
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jan 2012
#58
First off, their is no such thing as a soul, but to go ahead and continue your thought process...
snooper2
Jan 2012
#66