Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(13,079 posts)

7. I assumed it my error. I can't imagine why they weren't though.

Mon Apr 19, 2021, 07:23 PM

Apr 2021

Maybe in hopes of this very opportunity. They had nothing substantive.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Chauvin defense argued congresswoman Waters' comments were grounds for mistrial [View all] live love laugh Apr 2021 OP

Clutching at straws Stinky The Clown Apr 2021 #1

+1 live love laugh Apr 2021 #3

Exactly. The jury is sequestered so there's no impact. nt live love laugh Apr 2021 #5

The jury was not sequestered oregonjen Apr 2021 #6

I assumed it my error. I can't imagine why they weren't though. live love laugh Apr 2021 #7

why would anything she says matter? Takket Apr 2021 #4

No. They were not. One of the complaints that the Defense had. Caliman73 Apr 2021 #8

wow... Takket Apr 2021 #9

The defense had asked for sequestration last week and it was denied MichMan Apr 2021 #10