Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
49. I have been wondering the same thing
Sat Oct 13, 2012, 01:04 AM
Oct 2012

Last edited Sat Oct 13, 2012, 09:43 AM - Edit history (1)

I started a thread here on September 29 which was entitled Nate Silver gives Obama a 69.4 percent chance of winning Florida. On that day, he also predicted:

319.3 Electoral College Votes Projected for Obama
218.7 Electoral College Votes Projected for Romney

I checked earlier today and saw

283.1 EC votes for Obama
254.9 EC votes for Romney

66.8% chance of a Romney win in Florida (can you believe that after what he predicted on September 29th?)

57.4 chance of Romney win Colorado

52.5% chance of Romney win in Virginia (it was 76.5% percent chance of an Obama win on September 29)

63.5% chance of Obama win in Ohio (it was 83.9% chance of Obama win on September 29th)

89.5% chance of Obama win in Pennsylvania (it was 97.1% chance of Obama win on September 29th)

92.7% chance of Obama win in Michigan (it was 96.8% chance for Obama win on September 29th)

75.5% chance of Obama win in Wisconsin (it was 89.7% chance for Obama win on September 29th)

I simply cannot believe these dips in these percentages in not quite two weeks. It is just too astounding. Even if one believes Romney won that first debate (I personally do not; I think he defaulted through cheating and lying), that to me does not explain these steep drops.

If you have any thoughts on this, I would love to know what they are. I am, BTW, a Nate Silver fan. But something here does not pass the smell test.

Sam

September 29th thread: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021438787

he is using really bad polls. hrmjustin Oct 2012 #1
Isn't he using the same polls he always has? Lex Oct 2012 #35
he is using these polls that have been shown to be gop leaning ARG in particular. hrmjustin Oct 2012 #44
If his model hasn't changed from when Obama was ahead Lex Oct 2012 #48
That's only true if the polls keep the same methodology. Qutzupalotl Oct 2012 #54
I have been wondering that, too. femmocrat Oct 2012 #2
I seriously doubt he's been compromised, though. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #22
Righties have been pumping out polls a mile a minute since the first debate Godless in Seattle Oct 2012 #50
e doesn't write the polls chemp Oct 2012 #3
He's not interpreting them. He's plugging them into his model and interpreting that. gkhouston Oct 2012 #4
You put it better than I did, thanks, GK. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #18
Hope so. The undecided voters can't be as swayable by B.S. as we may think.....or can they? AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #25
pres blew the debate blueknight Oct 2012 #5
Somewhat true, but Romney's bounce ended not that long ago. nt AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #16
You don't have to be a genius to see how Cha Oct 2012 #58
nate's numbers are as good as they were when they had us winning arely staircase Oct 2012 #6
I'm not so sure of that anymore. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #12
im not sure either arely staircase Oct 2012 #17
I hope to start donating myself. Wish me luck. nt =) AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #24
luck upon you arely staircase Oct 2012 #27
Shooting the messenger? LeftyMom Oct 2012 #7
what happen to having a different point of view? DisabledAmerican Oct 2012 #13
Remember a few weeks ago when the right was all about skewed polls and creating their own reality? LeftyMom Oct 2012 #15
I agree, but that isn't what I'm doing. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #19
Your concern is noted seriously though I'm not buying the concern DisabledAmerican Oct 2012 #23
Are half of your 300 posts accusing people of concern trolling? LeftyMom Oct 2012 #28
Do you even know who the people are that found problems with his info? DisabledAmerican Oct 2012 #32
He adjusts for biased polls. This is not new. LeftyMom Oct 2012 #36
who said I was freaking out I just said this should be entertaining let them look into it DisabledAmerican Oct 2012 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author cthulu2016 Oct 2012 #57
I'm not the one concerned about a person looking into DisabledAmerican Oct 2012 #60
What you've said is true, in a way, BUT....... AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #14
If they are it'll clear up in a few days with new data. LeftyMom Oct 2012 #20
Bingo which is why do not worry if they look into it. DisabledAmerican Oct 2012 #33
Maybe, but maybe not. We'll see. nt AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #37
Or maybe Nate's not perfect? Maybe he is figuring in bad polling data? nm Cha Oct 2012 #59
You Don't Have To Be A Master Aggregator To Know The President Isn't Doing As Good As He Was DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2012 #8
Your concern has been noted DisabledAmerican Oct 2012 #10
What Did I Sat That Is Remarkable? DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2012 #30
This is going to be interesting DisabledAmerican Oct 2012 #9
disagree amborin Oct 2012 #11
I think it's because the debate screwed his numbers so badly budkin Oct 2012 #21
I'm beginning to think so, too.(no conspiracies, though) AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #26
Here's the problem, ProSense Oct 2012 #29
How Come The Only Pollster "We Have" Is PPP And The Pubbies Literally Have At Least A Dozen? DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2012 #31
Three gue$$e$... regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #46
It's the inertia of political events that are affecting the polls-- but it can and will change andym Oct 2012 #34
He's A Political Weathervane. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2012 #40
I took that all into account before writing this, though. nt AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #45
Nate's a numbers guy Coexist Oct 2012 #38
I won't believe him again until his numbers look better for Obama. tritsofme Oct 2012 #39
It's not like Sam Wang is any more positive in the numbers ProudToBeBlueInRhody Oct 2012 #41
i think his model doesn't just aggregate a day's polling. i think it extrapolates a trend. unblock Oct 2012 #43
I would rather think that ejbr Oct 2012 #47
I have been wondering the same thing Samantha Oct 2012 #49
Thanks, Sam. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #61
For the most part, I trust him. You realize the right wingers have folks saying the same thing? nt cecilfirefox Oct 2012 #51
Not quite the same thing, Cecil. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #55
LOL, once again, we love Nate when it looks good and hate him when.... Logical Oct 2012 #52
Here's the thing, Logical. I don't 'hate' Nate. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #56
Nate know more about right wing polls than the whole DU combined.... Logical Oct 2012 #67
Yeah, but it certainly doesn't invalidate my point. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #68
LOL, maybe Nate was wrong when he had us winning 80% to 20%. I would love to match your... Logical Oct 2012 #71
C'mon man. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #75
Nate NAILED the 2008 election and predicted we would get our ass kicked in 2010 and the DU HATED... Logical Oct 2012 #80
Very true, BUT...... AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #81
We should complain because we don't like the polls? MrSlayer Oct 2012 #53
We may have lost ground, but..... AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #62
What makes you think Kossacks can know a 'bounce' has ended? muriel_volestrangler Oct 2012 #65
It's difficult for me to explain right now. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #70
Sorry, I think Nate Silver knows what he's doing. cali Oct 2012 #63
I'm not really saying he doesn't, BUT...... AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #64
I agree with what you are saying and my guess is that Nate is in the process byeya Oct 2012 #69
I would hope so. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #76
Recommended for the interesting debate this OP has generated n/t Turborama Oct 2012 #66
Thanks. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #73
Looks like your theory has been validated here... Turborama Oct 2012 #85
You clearly know how to interpret polls better than Nate. former9thward Oct 2012 #72
Again, the problem is some of his sources, such as Mason-Dixon, etc. n/t AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #74
No that is your problem not his. former9thward Oct 2012 #79
You're not listening, man. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #82
gigo nt OhZone Oct 2012 #77
Explain, please? nt AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #83
G.I.G.O - OhZone Oct 2012 #84
I heard (from all places, Fox News) last night that the latest Virginia poll... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #78
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What is UP with Nate Silv...»Reply #49