Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,239 posts)
96. It wasn't me! 4 Sleazors Lawtwisting, LLC hacked my account and posted that!
Wed Feb 10, 2021, 12:31 AM
Feb 2021

4 Sleazors -- Ghoul, Powell, Cippy, & Cobbweb: When the law won't cover your ass, call in the CRAZY!

See, they're doing it again. That's not my commercial!

The check bounce? dflprincess Feb 2021 #1
They gotta know they are working pro bono. Unfortunately, they also probably know all they have... dutch777 Feb 2021 #10
Actually, about the only thing they didn't babble was that he was not guilty... Mazeltov Cocktail Feb 2021 #14
Pro Bonehead. KentuckyWoman Feb 2021 #79
+1 n/t Laelth Feb 2021 #80
they are panicing azureblue Feb 2021 #109
Ooh! leftieNanner Feb 2021 #2
is that bdamomma Feb 2021 #11
They've show terrible judgement in their client, I don't pity them PirateRo Feb 2021 #3
appreciate the informed insight. I am missing it all 'cause I'm at work... pnwest Feb 2021 #4
Yeah. My sympathy for them is very limited. n/t Laelth Feb 2021 #31
Some of the pundits on TV are saying they acted like they knew the jury was in their Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #5
Is that bdamomma Feb 2021 #15
Stacked jury? Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #18
Without a doubt. GP6971 Feb 2021 #78
don't forget that PIG Rand Paul. He is horrible trueblue2007 Feb 2021 #108
Probably true. Nothing for them to lose, wnylib Feb 2021 #68
Yep, no need to do any heavy lifting. Irish_Dem Feb 2021 #72
The jury is in their pocket. Hoyt Feb 2021 #6
that's true Alpeduez21 Feb 2021 #8
Exactly ailsagirl Feb 2021 #49
additionally, their client wants the argument Alpeduez21 Feb 2021 #7
One attorney was so nervous when he spoke BigmanPigman Feb 2021 #9
Honest to goodness, I have been there. Laelth Feb 2021 #25
I was afraid to speak in public until I became BigmanPigman Feb 2021 #30
being a teacher made me a pretty good public speaker dsc Feb 2021 #51
Do they really expect to get paid? lpbk2713 Feb 2021 #12
Clarify the issue you mentioned... FarPoint Feb 2021 #13
The question of whether the trial was constitutional was voted on separately from the actual trial; tblue37 Feb 2021 #20
Ahhhhhhh now I get it... FarPoint Feb 2021 #22
Yes. Leader Schumer played this brilliantly. n/t Laelth Feb 2021 #26
I am impressed! FarPoint Feb 2021 #28
Split the case into 2 questions...constitutionality and merit. theneworiginal Feb 2021 #27
Everyone knew this was coming, except them apparently. chriscan64 Feb 2021 #87
They actually thought that the House would vote "yes it's unconstitutional, let's all go home?" Maraya1969 Feb 2021 #16
Without the (allegedly) impossible Georgia runoffs, the Senate would have done so. Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2021 #101
I agree. Jirel Feb 2021 #17
Doesn't matter. Even if there were no rebuttal case or attorneys at all, acquittal is still insured. PSPS Feb 2021 #19
As it always is. As it always is. Some group controls the majority via power and fear. erronis Feb 2021 #45
Fire them hahaha !!! Wash. state Desk Jet Feb 2021 #21
Thank you for the experienced perspective underpants Feb 2021 #23
No. The "constitutionality" vote is unprecedented, afaik. Laelth Feb 2021 #37
A question: Do the rethugs who voted against the constitutionality MyMission Feb 2021 #73
Many of them, I suspect, will STILL vote to acquit on "unconstitutionality." Laelth Feb 2021 #76
Understandable gratuitous Feb 2021 #24
LOL. Yeah, who woulda thunk it? n/t Laelth Feb 2021 #40
I'm expecting... Xolodno Feb 2021 #29
I don't understand why it was a surprise. The moonscape Feb 2021 #32
You foresaw the Democrats' strategy--attorney or no. Laelth Feb 2021 #41
I just love seeing the rug pulled out from under them this way. crickets Feb 2021 #58
Yeah, well. DU rocks. Laelth Feb 2021 #61
Why would they panic? Bettie Feb 2021 #33
They don't want to be embarrassed on national television. Laelth Feb 2021 #70
Yeah, I suppose this makes them look like total idiots Bettie Feb 2021 #88
LOL. Yes. It does. n/t Laelth Feb 2021 #90
intentionally lame, so as to blame the short process? Then on to SCOTUS? If Chief Roberts wiggs Feb 2021 #34
That would be bizarre ... Laelth Feb 2021 #47
Roberts was already consulted on wnylib Feb 2021 #75
Did they get paid up front? keithbvadu2 Feb 2021 #35
Nah Johnny2X2X Feb 2021 #36
Are you sure? I heard that Hillary Clinton sent demons to burrow into their ears. Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2021 #38
Shame on you. Laelth Feb 2021 #92
It wasn't me! 4 Sleazors Lawtwisting, LLC hacked my account and posted that! Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2021 #96
I am glad that you posted that. Laelth Feb 2021 #100
Tanks fer da insider info Laelth! Glamrock Feb 2021 #39
You're very welcome. n/t Laelth Feb 2021 #44
Maybe it's deliberate bucolic_frolic Feb 2021 #42
Trump's got to blame somebody for everything that goes wrong. Laelth Feb 2021 #46
What, Me Worry? Skraxx Feb 2021 #43
As a trial attorney. I agree. I thought the same thing and have experienced not being totally Pepsidog Feb 2021 #48
It's utterly embarrassing, but yes. Laelth Feb 2021 #65
The Senate voted the trial constitutional, but GOPs will still acquit based on unconstitutionality Marcuse Feb 2021 #50
They could. I suspect many of them will. Laelth Feb 2021 #56
Does this mean that we should expect Matt Gaetz to burst through the door, donning his bullwinkle428 Feb 2021 #52
Bwaha! crickets Feb 2021 #59
While unlikely, anything is possible in Trumpworld. Laelth Feb 2021 #67
And despite all of this... ClusterFreak Feb 2021 #53
I don't get the panic - this isn't a criminal trial but a political one AlexSFCA Feb 2021 #54
Trump is vindictive. Laelth Feb 2021 #97
Makes a 'no' vote for conviction even harder for GOP senators who aren't insane. nt wiggs Feb 2021 #55
That's my take as well. n/t Laelth Feb 2021 #105
You cannot defend the smell that comes from a turd. Dan Feb 2021 #57
suffer long and hard. irisblue Feb 2021 #60
Womp womp. onecaliberal Feb 2021 #62
+1 n/t Laelth Feb 2021 #64
THEY decided to defend Trump. Kablooie Feb 2021 #63
I hear you. Laelth Feb 2021 #66
He had a team of lawyers who had time to develop a defense but drove them away. Kablooie Feb 2021 #69
The previous team wouldn't argue that Trump "won" the 2020 election. Laelth Feb 2021 #74
Will it make any difference? jalan48 Feb 2021 #71
It affects what the American people will see on TV. Laelth Feb 2021 #77
Well, I hope the media spends more time on Trump and less on his attorneys in this case. jalan48 Feb 2021 #94
We'll see. Laelth Feb 2021 #95
I hope it goes well for the Dems. I thought the video today was powerful. jalan48 Feb 2021 #98
Me too. n/t Laelth Feb 2021 #99
Love the commentary. Thank you so much! BobTheSubgenius Feb 2021 #81
You're quite welcome, and thank you. n/t Laelth Feb 2021 #93
Thank you for that excellent perspective that was easy for us non law types to grasp. Ligyron Feb 2021 #82
You're welcome. Laelth Feb 2021 #89
😁 underpants Feb 2021 #83
Returned home from work, having seen no news since early this morning... MerryBlooms Feb 2021 #84
If you think they're panicked what about donny doll hands? Will that clown Castor get fired tonight? George II Feb 2021 #85
Recommended. H2O Man Feb 2021 #86
As to Raskin, me too! n/t Laelth Feb 2021 #91
I'm proud to say that Raskin literally represents me! I live in his district and he's an absolute jpljr77 Feb 2021 #106
Nice! H2O Man Feb 2021 #107
No sleep for them tonight--which means another dismal, scrambling performance live love laugh Feb 2021 #102
I doubt that they will be able to sleep during the House's presentation. Laelth Feb 2021 #104
My fave part: them going: "And we plan to address all those other issues later, for realsies" Bucky Feb 2021 #103
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump's lawyers are panic...»Reply #96