Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The latest battleground state and national polls are in [View all]coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)158. Well, there for a time I believed Romney was on track to alienate every demographic other
that white males over the age of 65. So it was that belief that caused me to hope for 1964-redux, even though I knew I was being wildly optimistic in so hoping.
Thanks for your statistical analysis. Helps to keep all of us anchored in reality
Definitely not panicking but this OP brought me down a lot. (Either the pre-debate numbers were wrong, the post-debate numbers are wrong or Americans as an electorate are so flaky that they deserve a shithead like Romney because they would let one debate cause them to change their votes.)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
159 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Before you soiled yourself, did you actually look at who conducted the polls? nt.
OldDem2012
Oct 2012
#155
I haven't heard much lately about what the President has done to save our economy?
kentuck
Oct 2012
#3
It does appear 4-5% have been swayed by ridiculous pro-Romney cheerleading in the media.
reformist2
Oct 2012
#4
Yep. And I think this tells us that a small but significant amount of the President's support
cali
Oct 2012
#10
That's exactly what I've been saying. There was a part that was sqwishy
Laura PourMeADrink
Oct 2012
#152
You could have added Gallup, but that would have taken away from your point, right? Nt
speedoo
Oct 2012
#11
i understand you were so diappointed in obama during the debate. you made it clear, loudly. BUT...
seabeyond
Oct 2012
#15
If You Posted ARG During The 08 Primaries ( They Leaned Clinton) You Got Crucified
DemocratSinceBirth
Oct 2012
#103
Who will take the trouble of deconstructing the polls to determine how
Baitball Blogger
Oct 2012
#34
This bump, like all others, will be short lived.....when did you become..
Joe the Revelator
Oct 2012
#40
Will Pitt is an excellent writer, poilitical strategist and observer, and a fine and decent man
bigtree
Oct 2012
#69
To be clear, the numbers I posted are from EPIC's latest poll. Prosense is confused. nt
Romulox
Oct 2012
#66
Right, but that ignores a lot of detail. Michigan was thought to be "out of play" during the time
Romulox
Oct 2012
#71
LOL. A stunning level of analysis with someone OBVIOUSLY familiar with the facts! nt
Romulox
Oct 2012
#84
No, Michigan wasn't "always going to be in play". A month ago, the story was that PACS pulled their
Romulox
Oct 2012
#90
Indeed it did, since Michigan being "in play" is a big change from the recent past.
Romulox
Oct 2012
#76
If the polls are as screwed up as the last Pew poll, yes. Is that a problem? nt.
OldDem2012
Oct 2012
#156
This post really depresses me and I'm not sure exactly why. Maybe it's
coalition_unwilling
Oct 2012
#106
A 1964 Landslide Was Never In The Cards. What Led You To Believe Obama Could Get 62% Of The Vote?
DemocratSinceBirth
Oct 2012
#114
Well, there for a time I believed Romney was on track to alienate every demographic other
coalition_unwilling
Oct 2012
#158
Your constant, relentless, breathless reposting of every negative item written
cliffordu
Oct 2012
#129
I hope ALL Democrats understand - America likes what it perceives as fighters.
calimary
Oct 2012
#131