Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,079 posts)
20. I read the full artlcle earlier...
Tue Feb 2, 2021, 12:01 AM
Feb 2021

...and one point that I gleaned that I had not read before, it was planned for the rally crowd to remain at the Ellipsis Park until the certification was over....But Trump told them to march down to the Capitol, that he would be with them....but he didn't go with them. He went back to the White House to watch it on TV.

Haven't looked, check for Ruttenberg by-line. elleng Feb 2021 #1
Go to Nytimes.com it's the main story: mucifer Feb 2021 #2
here: elleng Feb 2021 #3
Great. Thanks a bunch. triron Feb 2021 #5
Unfortunately I am blocked unless I subscribe. triron Feb 2021 #6
Sorry. Key Takeaways From Trump's Effort to Overturn the Election elleng Feb 2021 #11
DOH? My Pet Orangutan Feb 2021 #14
What a jumbled mess of innuendo and slander and addled thinking. maxsolomon Feb 2021 #25
Trump invited the mob to a rally and told them to march to the Capitol building to "cheer on" emmaverybo Feb 2021 #24
You are exactly right. Very difficult to prove incitement when Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2021 #28
It's about the entire context, not just that one speech. radius777 Feb 2021 #31
Since impeachment is not a legal action, right. Legally, immediacy is a major element in emmaverybo Feb 2021 #51
me too. AND I DON'T HAVE THE DAM MONEY TO SUBSCRIBE TO ALL THESE PAPERS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! trueblue2007 Feb 2021 #17
Thank goodness for DU Ferrets are Cool Feb 2021 #19
PS The Guardian (British) is free. fierywoman Feb 2021 #22
The UK Guardian, already mentioned, is free & has excellent US coverage... Hekate Feb 2021 #26
Why is this a blockbuster? Johnny2X2X Feb 2021 #4
I think the news is 'orchestrated by the wh'. nt babylonsister Feb 2021 #7
Yeah, they planned a March Johnny2X2X Feb 2021 #12
According to Rachel's reporting it was not planned by the march organizers triron Feb 2021 #15
That's the main point she took from that article? Johnny2X2X Feb 2021 #21
How about instead of being pissed off at Rachel for being ourtraged, Vivienne235729 Feb 2021 #33
I can multitask Johnny2X2X Feb 2021 #37
So you're going to be pissed off at the messenger? Vivienne235729 Feb 2021 #39
Pissed off at their misrepresentation of the story Johnny2X2X Feb 2021 #40
How did she misrepresent the story? I think she is clarifying. Vivienne235729 Feb 2021 #44
Agree 110% triron Feb 2021 #45
It was barely part of the story Rachel referenced Johnny2X2X Feb 2021 #46
First of all, the NYT is not a pillar of credibility. Especially after that Biden Rolex story. Vivienne235729 Feb 2021 #48
Disagree Johnny2X2X Feb 2021 #49
I would agree w that but the half watching fox don't watch anything else but fox Vivienne235729 Feb 2021 #50
For one thing, the reporter says the permit for the rally specifically says pnwmom Feb 2021 #29
WOW !! So it looks like the law that was broken was inciting criminal trespassing by Red Don uponit7771 Feb 2021 #34
Well, it looks like the Women for America First could be held financially responsible pnwmom Feb 2021 #35
How is this breaking news? brettdale Feb 2021 #8
A march hadn't been planned. A rally had been planned, and a permit obtained pnwmom Feb 2021 #30
Thank you for saying it better than I did. triron Feb 2021 #38
You're welcome! This seems pretty significant. And the wording of the permit pnwmom Feb 2021 #42
Extremely significant. I think that was the main point Rachel was trying to make last night. triron Feb 2021 #43
I'm guessing it's somewhere in the four page exposethey published this morning. brooklynite Feb 2021 #9
Yes that's accurate. The Times reporter talked on that. triron Feb 2021 #13
I'm guessing it's somewhere in the four page exposethey published this morning. brooklynite Feb 2021 #10
K&R! SheltieLover Feb 2021 #16
Colour me soooooo not surprised. niyad Feb 2021 #18
I read the full artlcle earlier... kentuck Feb 2021 #20
Plus he told them they needed to fight to 'save their country'. triron Feb 2021 #41
Not a bombshell for me. It was so obvious ecstatic Feb 2021 #23
Huh? This story was from yesterday's NYT. Posted earlier Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2021 #27
Did the NY Post report that the National Park Service permit pnwmom Feb 2021 #47
I liked how it was mentioned Corgigal Feb 2021 #32
It's all he does, the fluff stuff. Someone once moonscape Feb 2021 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rachel (Maddow) just repo...»Reply #20