Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
102 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WOWZA! Drum Jan 2021 #1
If Rachel said it, it must be true👏👏 Walleye Jan 2021 #2
During the interview, which was taped, when Rachel pressed him about this, he just said StarfishSaver Jan 2021 #13
What? The filibuster? n/m El Supremo Jan 2021 #3
On organizing the Senate StarfishSaver Jan 2021 #11
The fillibuster is a big part of it. beastie boy Jan 2021 #20
Because he knows the Democrats don't have the votes to get rid of the filibuster. Sucha NastyWoman Jan 2021 #37
He thinks the Democrats don't have the votes. But he doesn't know it. beastie boy Jan 2021 #55
Something I hadn't considered. This shit sure can get get complicated. panader0 Jan 2021 #61
The Senate rules were set up this way to prevent the majority from just rolling over the minority StarfishSaver Jan 2021 #67
To make it even weaker though we need to win more senate seats in the next election. cstanleytech Jan 2021 #66
Agree. Also, aren't Dems supposed to pick up seats in 2022? ananda Jan 2021 #96
That depends on what we do. lagomorph777 Jan 2021 #97
Yeah, baby! n/t Ellipsis Jan 2021 #4
But but I've been reading all day that the MontanaFarmer Jan 2021 #5
If this is what disarray looks like, beastie boy Jan 2021 #21
Ka-Ching! AllyCat Jan 2021 #79
Man, that was quick. What did Schumer do? turtleblossom Jan 2021 #6
Just for clarity for others, this is regarding the Organizing Resolution Fiendish Thingy Jan 2021 #7
Thank you. WhiteTara Jan 2021 #16
No, not on normal legislation.... Manchin and Sinema won't budge on that. groundloop Jan 2021 #49
That may not be true in the end. Think of it as a sword over McConnells head...he won't be Demsrule86 Jan 2021 #75
I've not paid too much attention. But my take the real play was about reconciliation. GulfCoast66 Jan 2021 #84
Ty, Starfish! SheltieLover Jan 2021 #8
I still don't trust the turtle. madinmaryland Jan 2021 #9
My first thought too. What is his next move. Irish_Dem Jan 2021 #12
And nobody should turn their back on him. catrose Jan 2021 #51
Never ever trust this guy in any way. Irish_Dem Jan 2021 #54
same here [nt] Nexus2 Jan 2021 #57
+1, uponit7771 Jan 2021 #88
No way! sheshe2 Jan 2021 #10
Love that Happy Dance gif. iluvtennis Jan 2021 #31
I stole it. sheshe2 Jan 2021 #33
He's agreeing to the 2001 organizing rules, but what do those rules say about filibusters? Blaukraut Jan 2021 #14
Those rules say nothing about the filibuster, which is the beauty StarfishSaver Jan 2021 #19
Ah. I thought I read somewhere that the 2001 rules mentioned filibuster. Blaukraut Jan 2021 #26
I may have misspoken StarfishSaver Jan 2021 #30
Maybe Mitch knows WA-03 Democrat Jan 2021 #29
I really wonder Lysol2020 Jan 2021 #15
OK, but Mitch says this. We'll have to see what it means. servermsh Jan 2021 #17
it means schumer had him in a box and knew it... getagrip_already Jan 2021 #34
Mitch's new home is Turtle Cave Blue Owl Jan 2021 #18
Schumer is animated and enthusiastic tonight bucolic_frolic Jan 2021 #22
Winning feels good...what the naysayers miss is the filibuster being on the table still Demsrule86 Jan 2021 #83
I HEARD THAT! YAY! ancianita Jan 2021 #23
Great. And to think that I was just reading (here) about how Schumer caved. He's sneaky good! George II Jan 2021 #24
I'm sure whomever stated that Cha Jan 2021 #44
. denbot Jan 2021 #86
You'll always read such here mcar Jan 2021 #59
WOW!! I am going to have to go find this.... Vivienne235729 Jan 2021 #25
Schumer orangecrush Jan 2021 #27
So Manchin and Sinesma bluecollar2 Jan 2021 #28
say what? no... getagrip_already Jan 2021 #32
If you say so... bluecollar2 Jan 2021 #35
now now.... getagrip_already Jan 2021 #38
No he caved because he knows Schumer doesn't have the votes to get rid if the filibuster Sucha NastyWoman Jan 2021 #46
manchin and sinoma just made general statements about the fillibuster as a rule... getagrip_already Jan 2021 #50
Concern writ large.. denbot Jan 2021 #87
I read that TWO dem senators promised... reACTIONary Jan 2021 #36
it's a win because we get everything we wanted... getagrip_already Jan 2021 #40
I am told (another thead)that what Mitch wanted.. reACTIONary Jan 2021 #48
he had it a week ago..... getagrip_already Jan 2021 #52
That makes more sense then... reACTIONary Jan 2021 #56
He wasn't going to lose the filibuster - Manchin and S still moonscape Jan 2021 #91
This....+100..n/t bluecollar2 Jan 2021 #41
For one thing.. mvd Jan 2021 #43
Why are Sinema and Manchin so dead set on maintaining the fillibuster? Nexus2 Jan 2021 #62
That's what I would like to know! Vivienne235729 Jan 2021 #64
They still haven't realized how abusive the Repukes have been mvd Jan 2021 #69
Did you ever consider the motivation behind the statements was to end the McConnell rules crap? Demsrule86 Jan 2021 #78
... then reverse themselves later? unnnnn, we'll see. kGOP abuses filibuster to nth degree and we uponit7771 Jan 2021 #89
It leaves all options on the table without blowing up the Senate in the first week. Demsrule86 Jan 2021 #101
👍 uponit7771 Jan 2021 #102
Exactly Politicalgolfer Jan 2021 #47
The made no such promise. They made a statement that they opposed getting rid of the filibuster, Demsrule86 Jan 2021 #76
And, again.. I'm sure the Apologies Cha Jan 2021 #39
Not from me...n/t bluecollar2 Jan 2021 #42
Yeah, That was Sarcasm. Cha Jan 2021 #45
Don't hold your breath mcar Jan 2021 #60
lol.. it was very Cha Jan 2021 #63
I wonder if it was the Money People behind McConnell that convinced him to move things along. Midnight Writer Jan 2021 #53
I was thinking this too. The GOP was beginning to hemorrhage corporate donors Vivienne235729 Jan 2021 #65
No, it couldn't be mcar Jan 2021 #58
They need to learn how to fight, they need to act like Republicans, they don't understand the stakes StarfishSaver Jan 2021 #70
GOOD. What the hell took him so long? calimary Jan 2021 #68
Too many variables, too many unknowns, and, historically, FAR too much perfidy from the GOP. BobTheSubgenius Jan 2021 #71
Gotta admit, until we know more, I'm in "other shoe drops" mode JHB Jan 2021 #72
So, no matter what the Democrats do, you still assume they aren't getting it right StarfishSaver Jan 2021 #73
No, and what the hell is this insinuation about? JHB Jan 2021 #74
I am sure it is not good enough. I on the other hand do celebrate. In order to govern, you must Demsrule86 Jan 2021 #80
What other side ?! The kGOP is NOT interested in democracy any longer. What else do they uponit7771 Jan 2021 #90
There is no other option. We do not have a strong majority, and we have moderates in our party. Demsrule86 Jan 2021 #99
That is just ridiculous. You won't get what you want all the time but we will move forward. We have Demsrule86 Jan 2021 #77
Nice speech. Save it for someone who said anything more than... JHB Jan 2021 #82
You are RATIONALLY skeptical relative to Moscow Mitch's last 10 years of being an asshole traitor .. uponit7771 Jan 2021 #92
I will be blunt- there are some who are constantly looking for Democratic failure and Demsrule86 Jan 2021 #100
I agree but am not as optimistic as to what we can get done. GulfCoast66 Jan 2021 #85
1.9 billion for CV19 relief is the start, we can't fly an airliner on 1/90 th tank of fuel it will uponit7771 Jan 2021 #93
I totally agree with you on those policy points GulfCoast66 Jan 2021 #95
K&R betsuni Jan 2021 #81
Video malaise Jan 2021 #94
If getting control of the committees and assuring all legislation Alpeduez21 Jan 2021 #98
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rachel Maddow just announ...