Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tokenlib

(4,186 posts)
44. It's a lot easier to be the "tweak-er" than the "tweak-ee"--think about it "grand bargainers"...
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 02:24 AM
Oct 2012

..and then make sure you sleep well at night...

"That must mean that Romney won't cut a cent from Social Security Benefits" ProSense Oct 2012 #1
Do you think that's what the President meant? MannyGoldstein Oct 2012 #2
Here: ProSense Oct 2012 #4
I don't see any reassurance that SS won't be cut. MannyGoldstein Oct 2012 #10
Indeed. 'Tweaked in the way Reagan tweaked it...' Marr Oct 2012 #17
"tweaked the way it was by Ronald Reagan and Speaker" = having workers pay more than the HiPointDem Oct 2012 #12
There was an actual problem that needed to be solved under Reagan MannyGoldstein Oct 2012 #15
The problem that needed to be solved was simply that the trust fund balance had gone nearly HiPointDem Oct 2012 #18
I think it meant that Romney will run away from a similarity...... Sheepshank Oct 2012 #3
The Simpson-Bowles Commission report is being touted............ socialist_n_TN Oct 2012 #5
The poorer you make them, the more fearful and docile they become jsr Oct 2012 #7
The deck was stacked by 'our' guy. appal_jack Oct 2012 #8
Thank you. woo me with science Oct 2012 #16
Oh now now, Woo Oilwellian Oct 2012 #37
It seems woo me with science Oct 2012 #38
Cutting... but not slashing... MannyGoldstein Oct 2012 #40
The "save-the-safety-net" side had token representation Art_from_Ark Oct 2012 #45
Had she been chair... appal_jack Oct 2012 #55
It's just easier for most folks to push realities like this out of their mind. Poll_Blind Oct 2012 #6
We are bought and sold. woo me with science Oct 2012 #9
If you keep voting for it kenny blankenship Oct 2012 #11
explain to me, if you can, where the 22% cut in benefits comes from? hfojvt Oct 2012 #13
It's calculated by the Chief Actuary of Social Security MannyGoldstein Oct 2012 #14
SS will still be able to pay out about 80% of presently scheduled benefits if no changes at all are HiPointDem Oct 2012 #19
Why are we talking about a 75 year horizon? abumbyanyothername Oct 2012 #33
Because that's the way the politicians set it up in 1982 -- on an 'actuarial basis'. HiPointDem Oct 2012 #35
"And it's pure fraud." Occulus Oct 2012 #20
how many benefits it cuts depends on income level hfojvt Oct 2012 #23
"Scaled Medium Earner" from the Chief Actuary's letter MannyGoldstein Oct 2012 #24
Cost of living is a relative measure... ljm2002 Oct 2012 #22
Excellent & true points, n/t. appal_jack Oct 2012 #48
I did a double take when I heard that remark... ljm2002 Oct 2012 #21
that one quote is DISTURBING- W H comment line here I come !!! tokenlib Oct 2012 #29
Post removed Post removed Oct 2012 #39
Kick woo me with science Oct 2012 #25
Any second now. JoePhilly Oct 2012 #26
And people wonder why I characterize compliments you might give him as backhanded... nt stevenleser Oct 2012 #27
right on fucking cue... Whisp Oct 2012 #28
I seriously cringed when he said that. nt NCTraveler Oct 2012 #30
I think it was a rhetorical strategy BarackTheVote Oct 2012 #31
"...and Obama went after him with incensed incredulity. It was a win." rudycantfail Oct 2012 #34
Write and call your representatives today. Call the White House. woo me with science Oct 2012 #32
As I type this, the post above says "What advice would you give the president for the next debate?" lumberjack_jeff Oct 2012 #36
Kick. Luminous Animal Oct 2012 #41
Obama's Social Security Answer Leaves Democrats Utterly Baffled Lasher Oct 2012 #42
Obama's been straight about his position since MannyGoldstein Oct 2012 #43
I recall that during the 2008 primary DURHAM D Oct 2012 #49
It's a lot easier to be the "tweak-er" than the "tweak-ee"--think about it "grand bargainers"... tokenlib Oct 2012 #44
Kick. This is important. nt woo me with science Oct 2012 #46
Kick woo me with science Oct 2012 #47
Kick woo me with science Oct 2012 #50
I can see having to adjust SSI if Politicalboi Oct 2012 #51
Austerity is coming regardless of who wins. CrispyQ Oct 2012 #52
For the moment this is still a democracy..we don't have to roll over and take the "tweaking." N/T tokenlib Oct 2012 #53
Kick in response to Axelrod inferring this needs to be discussed in "quiet rooms" when on Fox News.. tokenlib Oct 2012 #54
After the election, it will be too late to find out... kentuck Oct 2012 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama praises Romney: &qu...»Reply #44