Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bucolic_frolic

(43,062 posts)
9. First they'd have to find the can
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 08:25 PM
Dec 2020

No standing. They'd consider something more if something adverse to all citizens of TX were found? But it sounds like a dead end to me. A state has no investigatory powers in other states' elections, so no evidence. If you sue blue because the voters or state didn't vote red ... you're harming blue everywhere. It's a zero sum game. Ballots are secret for good reasons, and the best we can do, like accounting, is to have systems and ledgers and backups and methods that have public accountability. It doesn't need to involve an election witch hunt. That's how I see it anyway.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's the SC opinion. Sh...»Reply #9