Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CrispyQ

(36,221 posts)
6. It doesn't. The whole fucking electoral system is corrupt & compromised.
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 11:06 AM
Oct 2012

"The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery."
~Zappa


With each election a little more of the scenery is taken down.

Any takers? n/t porphyrian Oct 2012 #1
Why don't you do some research? cali Oct 2012 #2
So, what is your point, then? porphyrian Oct 2012 #5
...also, you failed to suggest a solution. Please do so. n/t porphyrian Oct 2012 #8
do try reading, honey. cali Oct 2012 #9
I'm not your "honey," condescending person, and that is no solution. porphyrian Oct 2012 #10
It's in my prior post. cali Oct 2012 #11
So, then, you have no solution. porphyrian Oct 2012 #12
The part we're worried about is, "...and all the votes are counted..." CrispyQ Oct 2012 #3
How would that help those effected by the myriad of new laws cali Oct 2012 #4
It doesn't. The whole fucking electoral system is corrupt & compromised. CrispyQ Oct 2012 #6
That's my take. n/t porphyrian Oct 2012 #14
Agreed, but electronic voting machines are a reality in this election, as they have been since 2000. porphyrian Oct 2012 #7
Anyone who actually has a solution? We have roughly a month. n/t porphyrian Oct 2012 #13
This is not an irrational position. n/t porphyrian Oct 2012 #15
The one Australia adopted over 20 years ago - mandatory voting. HopeHoops Oct 2012 #16
I could support that. Isn't voting our civic duty? porphyrian Oct 2012 #17
Beyond that, you've got to have some faith that the machines haven't been fucked with. HopeHoops Oct 2012 #18
It's easier if the election is actually close. I'm not convinced it will be. n/t porphyrian Oct 2012 #19
There's no indication that it will be close. That's why I said "only so much". HopeHoops Oct 2012 #20
Right, we're agreeing. porphyrian Oct 2012 #21
What I don't buy is the "paper trails are expensive" argument. That's bullshit. HopeHoops Oct 2012 #22
Yep, that's bullshit. porphyrian Oct 2012 #23
It's been privatized all along. Diebold isn't exactly a charity operation and certainly not "gubmint HopeHoops Oct 2012 #24
Again, if the boss wanted it, they would make the change. porphyrian Oct 2012 #25
I'm afraid "county by county" (or townships here in PA) will be the only path to success. HopeHoops Oct 2012 #26
I only say state level because of state laws. Local is the best place to start. n/t porphyrian Oct 2012 #27
PA's a little different. We have 66 counties, but they don't amount to much. HopeHoops Oct 2012 #28
I don't think people realize how different things are state by state. porphyrian Oct 2012 #29
I grew up in MD where EVERYTHING was at the county level. PA and NH were quite different. HopeHoops Oct 2012 #30
I like THAT one. Tigress DEM Oct 2012 #33
. n/t porphyrian Oct 2012 #31
. n/t porphyrian Oct 2012 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If we all vote and all th...»Reply #6