Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

OnDoutside

(19,945 posts)

10. I don't know who it was but some knowledgeable lawyer suggested

Reply to Hero57 (Original post)

Fri Sep 18, 2020, 10:18 PM

Sep 2020

a few months ago that they should nominate a new SC panel of 19 judges including 10 new ones, and cases would be decided by a random panel of 3.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Democrats should threaten 2 more Supreme Court [View all] Hero57 Sep 2020 OP

Why 2 when 4 would give us the majority? bmpbmp Sep 2020 #1

13 is a number that is avoided. The expansion would either be to 11 or 15. nt Blue_true Sep 2020 #8

In negotiations, you start high, like adding 6 then agree on 4. Hassler Sep 2020 #2

Six Miguelito Loveless Sep 2020 #3

SCOTUS rso Sep 2020 #4

you'd better hold on to the senate forever then AlexSFCA Sep 2020 #7

you better win the Senate first rockfordfile Sep 2020 #5

But not until after the election. Blaukraut Sep 2020 #6

we should do it if it happens and we win qazplm135 Sep 2020 #9

I don't know who it was but some knowledgeable lawyer suggested OnDoutside Sep 2020 #10

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democrats should threaten...»Reply #10