Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Saviolo

(3,280 posts)
Mon Sep 24, 2012, 04:17 PM Sep 2012

One of the many ways we're screwed. [View all]

This news is a little old, but this is the first I've heard about it. It's hard to believe that this could happen, but... then again, it's not so hard to believe.

Here's the story:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/7862246/How-a-broker-spent-520m-in-a-drunken-stupor-and-moved-the-global-oil-price.html

To paraphrase, a brokerage employee during a drunken blackout state traded so much money on oil futures that it changed the price of oil globally. One man, while incoherently drunk.

Some excerpts (emphasis mine):

It was 7.45am on June 30 last year when the senior, longstanding broker for PVM Oil Futures was contacted by an admin clerk querying why he'd bought 7m barrels of crude in the middle of the night.

By 10am it emerged that Mr Perkins had single-handedly moved the global price of oil to an eight-month high during a "drunken blackout". Prices leapt by more than $1.50 a barrel in under half an hour at around 2am – the kind of sharp swing caused by events of geo-political significance. Ten times the usual volume of futures contracts changed hands in just one hour.

By the time PVM realised the trades were not authorised and swiftly began to unwind the positions, losses of exactly $9,763,252 had stacked up.

Mr Perkins' trading stopped for a few hours, but in the early hours of the morning, he returned to the oil market via his laptop. He placed an incredible $520m in orders through ICE Futures Europe, where traders can buy or sell crude oil for future delivery and bet on whether prices will go up or down. The first trade was at 1.22am was at $71.40 per barrel and the last trade at 3.41am was at $73.05. During this period, Mr Perkins gradually edged up the price by bidding higher each time, until he was responsible for 69pc of the global market volume.

Mr Perkins told investigators that he has "limited recollection" of the entire episode, claiming he had placed the trades during a drink-induced stupor.

Having admitted to an alcohol problem and received treatment, Mr Perkins was banned from trading for five years and hit with a £72,000 fine, reduced from £150,000 because of potential financial hardship.


Let's put that into perspective. $1.50 increase on a barrel of oil means that some people had to decide between filling their car to go to work or eating that week. Did people their jobs because they couldn't afford the gas to get to them? Did people die because they couldn't afford oil to heat their homes. This one man pushed oil prices up -globally-.

I'd say he deserves a harsher punishment than what is indicated in the article, but the problem is systemic. Brokers and corporations all have their collective twitchy finger on the same button. But no, they want to be deregulated further. They want no oversight. They want the inmates to run the asylum.
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
so make the switch to EV or bio-diesel, or hydrogen... a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #1
Not the switch that needs to be made Saviolo Sep 2012 #2
by making that switch, you remove their power over you a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #3
Because addicts are always at the mercy of the dealer. Always. Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #22
$1.50 increase on the barrel SheilaT Sep 2012 #4
about 3 extra pennies a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #5
That adds up Saviolo Sep 2012 #7
oh jebbers christmas a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #8
Lucky for you. progressoid Sep 2012 #15
sounds like a slippery slope argument... n/t a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #16
Hmmm progressoid Sep 2012 #18
Could I ask an imposition of you, and ask you to a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #19
I was going to ask the same of you. progressoid Sep 2012 #20
glad to oblige... a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #21
Funny thing is, we've been going down an actual slope. progressoid Sep 2012 #23
then maybe we should change tactics... a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #24
I'm not aware of too many people who purchase merely one gallon of gas.. LanternWaste Sep 2012 #27
okay, let's try this... a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #29
Public floggings would put a fast stop JNelson6563 Sep 2012 #6
what a wonderfully nuanced strategy a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #9
I'm nothing if not subtle. JNelson6563 Sep 2012 #11
Why not just take the guy out into a field and shoot him? a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #12
I'll be happy to take him, shoot him, anyone else he's trained, and anyone mbperrin Sep 2012 #14
mbperrin... I wouldn't want to visit the sins of the father on the kids a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #17
Well...okay, but you are a better person than I am. mbperrin Sep 2012 #25
Thnak you good sir/madam... a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #26
it's mind-boggling to me the companies themselves don't have tighter controls. unblock Sep 2012 #10
Spiking the punch, eh? HopeHoops Sep 2012 #13
...oh well, just read my sig line. RagAss Sep 2012 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One of the many ways we'r...