Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A question for those who are against the use of atomics bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki: [View all]maxsolomon
(33,240 posts)81. Pretty much.
History is a catalogue of horrors.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A question for those who are against the use of atomics bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki: [View all]
Dial H For Hero
Aug 2020
OP
If you don't choosse any of the options listed, how would you have defeated Japan?
Dial H For Hero
Aug 2020
#2
Exactly. Any other realistic option, from an invasion of the Home Islands to simply blockading them
Dial H For Hero
Aug 2020
#38
I cant's fly there. Please answer the question. What would you do to defeat Japan in 1945?
Dial H For Hero
Aug 2020
#7
They didn't surrender after we nuked one of their cities. Why would a single demonstration bomb
Dial H For Hero
Aug 2020
#10
They were surrounded, beaten, and starving. What the heck were they going to do to us?
Hoyt
Aug 2020
#20
They were no threat to the USA in March 1945. But they still had to be defeated.
Dial H For Hero
Aug 2020
#33
Yes, the Nagasaki A-bomb killed 180 POWs. And our bombers killed 68,000 French citizens over the
Dial H For Hero
Aug 2020
#47
Points for being brief, I suppose...but would you care to answer the question?
Dial H For Hero
Aug 2020
#13
The Japanese were barbaric from Korea to the Philippines. Pearl Harbor was uncivilized.
Karadeniz
Aug 2020
#12
Wording of the leaflets dropped on Hiroshima Nagasaki and 33 other Japanese cities on 1 August 1945
EX500rider
Aug 2020
#56
Was the question of what to do inauthentic for Harry Truman? What should he have done in 1945?
Dial H For Hero
Aug 2020
#36
I was conceived immediately after the bombing of Nagasaki, born in May 1946.
Silver Swan
Aug 2020
#31
It is the 75th Anniversary. Tell you what: I won't start another thread about it until 2044.
Dial H For Hero
Aug 2020
#54
possibly nothing? iirc, the Japanese were already considering surrender at the time
0rganism
Aug 2020
#40
Japan wanted conditions for an end to hostilities that were intolerable to the allies
Ex Lurker
Aug 2020
#53
How come nobody ever says "Do you know how many Americans would have been killed
Aristus
Aug 2020
#45
We didn't have nuclear weapons until after Germany was defeated. They weren't an option in 1944 or
Dial H For Hero
Aug 2020
#52
The nature of the war in the European Theater of Operations was completely different.
Dial H For Hero
Aug 2020
#58
It is actually a myth that Japan surrendered because of the atomic bombs.
Trumpocalypse
Aug 2020
#46
Good ? for Death Count Donnie, he should consult with Hara Kiri *cough* Charlie ASAP?
Brainfodder
Aug 2020
#48
But had Japan not surrendered, we surely would have ramped up production. As evidence:
Dial H For Hero
Aug 2020
#66
Your original point is correct; it would have been another two weeks before a third A-bomb could be
Dial H For Hero
Aug 2020
#71
This thread was intitally removed for kooky, extremist, or hate content I appealed, pointing out
Dial H For Hero
Aug 2020
#75