One of my sisters told me she watched Rachel a couple of times. Thought the information was good, but that she "parsed" it too much. It personally works for me...I hate it when reporters give you a "headline", spend 15 seconds on something important, and then move on like they never said anything. If Fox reported on this at all, I'm sure it consisted of, "The NY Times reported that Putin paid a bounty to the Taliban to kill American soldiers. Putin has denied it." End of story.
She may "over analyze" some things, but damn...I'd rather have that then the "move along, nothing to see here" attitude of the networks. And I don't want to get all full of myself here, but I honestly thing a vast majority of the folks here are, let's just say, a little brighter than the average bear out there. Except for the trolls, of course.(Hi guys!
) We may not need things to be explained to that point, but an awful lot of people need those dots connected for them, or they'll never get from A to B.
Edit history
= new reply since forum marked as read
