Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Tearing down Confederate statues I can understand. But Ulysses S. Grant? [View all]brush
(53,761 posts)29. You are correct. Grant didn't buy the enslaved man, did work side by side with him in the field...
and then freed him even though he was told he could get a lot of money for him.
Grant also wouldn't allow surrendering confederates to keep their slaves. He allowed them to keep their horses and sidearms but not their slaves.
Grant was decent man, and the best general of the Civil War.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Tearing down Confederate statues I can understand. But Ulysses S. Grant? [View all]
jcmaine72
Jun 2020
OP
In San Francisco someone last night defaced statues of poets and other non political figures In
kimbutgar
Jun 2020
#11
We may be in a situation where only from the ashes of oppression can we rebuild in equality.
PTWB
Jun 2020
#22
No pummeling at all. I agree completely. Recently read that Grant's autobiography is....
EarnestPutz
Jun 2020
#2
Ta-Nahesi Coates wrote about this in "The Atlantic" and dismissed the question of....
EarnestPutz
Jun 2020
#68
Grants father was anti-slavery. His father-in-law owned slaves and his bride was...
brush
Jun 2020
#33
Might be people who don't know history and thought the statue was of a Confederate.
Kaleva
Jun 2020
#10
Dude launched an illegal war against the Lakota after trying paternalistic assimilationism.
WhiskeyGrinder
Jun 2020
#21
Absolutely. I posted about it last December, but there's never a bad time to remember it.
WhiskeyGrinder
Jun 2020
#26
How about do something substantive about the lives of oppressed people rather than symbolic crap
DTomlinson
Jun 2020
#57
He also helped win the Civil War and oversaw successful Reconstruction before it was rolled back.
DTomlinson
Jun 2020
#56
Maybe statues aren't the best way to tell the complicated history of someone's actions.
WhiskeyGrinder
Jun 2020
#60
You are correct. Grant didn't buy the enslaved man, did work side by side with him in the field...
brush
Jun 2020
#29
When less than half of people can name one SC justice, I doubt many even know who the statues are
MichMan
Jun 2020
#53
Aside from the Confederate statutes, this is symbolic nonsense/an excuse for vandalism.
DTomlinson
Jun 2020
#55