Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: France: Yet another nation turns against globalism: 80% see it as a job-killer [View all]Zalatix
(8,994 posts)8. I'd count that as a fault.
"France is probably the only country in the world where you can complain to your wife that your mistress doesn't understand you." .... that's not a good thing.
Just imagine if she started complaining to you that the man on the side doesn't understand her............
But hey, no nation is perfect.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
France: Yet another nation turns against globalism: 80% see it as a job-killer [View all]
Zalatix
Sep 2012
OP
It's very high, and the Democratic Party and liberals are making a huge mistake
JDPriestly
Sep 2012
#5
You left out the TRADE DEFICIT as a contributor to the budget deficit. PBS link:
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#19
Yes it is "by a slightly circuitous route." OTOH, the Bush contributions to the deficit are not
pampango
Sep 2012
#34
A contributor, but a tiny one (hardly an earthquake) compared to the Bush legacy (which has caused
pampango
Sep 2012
#40
Eliminate the domestic budget entirely and the trade deficit will still drag us down.
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#41
Before someone we all know shows up with that inaccurate Pew poll, allow me to pre-empt:
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#11
Too late. BTW that "inaccurate" poll shows opposition to globalization growing to 68% by 2012 if
pampango
Sep 2012
#16
Sounds like you acknowledge that "protectionism was a Republican thing". FDR would have agreed.
pampango
Sep 2012
#20
Protectionism WAS a Republican thing. Just like abolishing slavery WAS a Republican thing.
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#22
FDR did't fight higher tariffs because it was a republican thing, but because it was a BAD thing.
pampango
Sep 2012
#33
No it does not. It means that local/state/federal governments would have to buy from American
pampango
Sep 2012
#42
Yes it does. Stop being myopic. Protectionism began among the workers, not the FAR RIGHT.
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#45
No. Protectionism was rejected by workers and progressives repeatedly in our history.
pampango
Sep 2012
#46
Protectionism rejected by workers? Now you're just engaging in wishful thinking.
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#49
It was rejected by workers 100 years ago, again during FDR's administration and today
pampango
Sep 2012
#50
Workers rejected protectionism 100 years ago? LOL! Whatever you need to say to comfort yourself.
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#53
"Again, tariffs protect the working class." And yet it is only republicans who have ever promoted
pampango
Sep 2012
#60
"Republicans support tariffs, ergo tariffs are bad". No. republicans support tariffs because
pampango
Sep 2012
#66
Still retreating to that Republican argument. You still can't accept the opposition is BIPARTISAN.
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#68
I am glad that you are finding common ground with - let's call it the non-corporate wing
pampango
Sep 2012
#71
The poster from CATO has now devolved into calling *everyone else* a "Republican".
Romulox
Sep 2012
#81
Tea Party Repubs are rubes, and we all know it. The REAL money men at CATO agree with you 100%
Romulox
Sep 2012
#21
The 'strange bedfellows' argument, always a favorite. We all have them. Anything on this page
pampango
Sep 2012
#39
Still not disputing the historical basis that I provided for the statement, I see. n/t
pampango
Sep 2012
#61
Why is is laughably wrong? I need specifics (facts) not fancy slogans and assertions.
pampango
Sep 2012
#72
You contention that "free trade" hasn't decimated the US working class. Let's start there. nt
Romulox
Sep 2012
#79
You are not a "progressive". There is nothing "progressive" about you. Advocating for the powerful
Romulox
Sep 2012
#80
"Strange bedfellows" means you agree on one area, while DISAGREEING on most others.
Romulox
Sep 2012
#78
If so many Democrats support offshoring then why is Obama attacking Romney for OFFSHORING???
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#24
Meanwhile, the effort to discredit the new President has taken a familiar turn,...
Spitfire of ATJ
Sep 2012
#7
They accuse everyone they don't like of SEX! It's getting old, people like sex and they
sabrina 1
Sep 2012
#12
Which would mean those rioting crazies in Libya could move right next door to you.
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#27
Your refusal to accept the basic facts would get many of the rest of us killed if you had any power.
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#30
What you want is for Middle Eastern voters to have a say about your reproductive rights.
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#32
Europe doesn't have open borders with the Middle East. Please keep up. We're talking about
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#54
Of course not, but they have open borders with many more countries than we do (0).
pampango
Sep 2012
#62
Other nations will not open their borders to each other. You're just wishfully thinking AGAIN.
Zalatix
Sep 2012
#64
Wow. France is quitting the EU? That ultimate free trade, no tariffs, region?
Nye Bevan
Sep 2012
#43
Only the far-right National Front wants France to get out of the EU. Fortunately, they lost
pampango
Sep 2012
#47
Read a newspaper, for the love of god. The EU is currently in an existential crisis.
Romulox
Sep 2012
#82
It should be completely obvious to any reasonable person that globalism is a late stage terminal
Zorra
Sep 2012
#51
Those should be decisions made by the citizens of those nations. I don't live there. nt
Zorra
Sep 2012
#75