Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This is all the "civility" I can manage: someone tell me again why "Doctor" Birx is [View all]Apparently, my constant hand washing, cleaning my work space, refusal to shake hands (one coworker needed multiple hand shakes throughout the day,) and "social distancing" (approx one meter) has become the new normal.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
132 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This is all the "civility" I can manage: someone tell me again why "Doctor" Birx is [View all]
Atticus
Mar 2020
OP
I just started reading this thread - but IMO you've already won it with 'COVID-45'.
Talitha
Mar 2020
#43
If we're designating counties by levels of risk, it should only be done to provide a guideline . . .
Journeyman
Mar 2020
#5
It should be empirical data driven by testing. If testing is the bases of the decision then its good
uponit7771
Mar 2020
#21
Are you the person who's doing the math projections? What is your estimate of length of time for
uponit7771
Mar 2020
#26
Two months minimum, if we shut EVERYTHING down. Letting the virus run it's course...
ahoysrcsm
Mar 2020
#79
I'm not doing projections -- I'm just tracking as testing ramps up in different states.
pat_k
Mar 2020
#84
Correction, in Italy and in Iceland it's 50% of the people are asymptomatic (link)
uponit7771
Mar 2020
#88
I think they are just going out there to drive the market back up any way they can. People
brewens
Mar 2020
#7
If the "evaluate" means testing then of course she's right ... if the "evaluate" means taking ...
uponit7771
Mar 2020
#20
How does she expect to do that, when all but 5 states have tested less than 20 per 10,000 people???
pat_k
Mar 2020
#23
Where did you get this info? And is per capita information available for confirmed cases?
LAS14
Mar 2020
#33
Worldmeter - Coronavirus page has cases per million and deaths per million, but no tests per million
pat_k
Mar 2020
#85
Closer to 10.6 and projected to possibly go over that at the time of the 2020 census. nt
littlemissmartypants
Mar 2020
#82
i believe this is the same fool that told us that millennials were going to teach boomers how to
dawn5651
Mar 2020
#25
I'm thinking this is where her and Dr Fauci are going with their responses. They're aiming at testin
uponit7771
Mar 2020
#69
Red counties lower pop density magically to be freer, til it breaks out in every last one of them.nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2020
#36
Dr Birx lost a lot of respect at today's presser. Very disappointed in her. nt
iluvtennis
Mar 2020
#60
It is your right to defend her. My OP clearly stated my opinion of those who do. nt
Atticus
Mar 2020
#89
Realize that everybody on that dais knows they are dealing with a dangerous fool ...
Straw Man
Mar 2020
#87
Large counties with fewer people will be designated "low risk."
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
Mar 2020
#110
Geographically large counties with small populations will have the lowest risk rating.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
Mar 2020
#121