HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » In 2024, assuming we have... » Reply #31

Response to Algernon Moncrieff (Original post)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 09:28 PM

31. This is a REALLY tough question.

It is not my place to advise the DNC, but I am going to do so, regardless, because this thread has asked me to do so.

1. Let Iowa and New Hampshire go first. It's fine. Both states have developed a strong cadre of intelligent voters because they have been going first in our nominating process for so very long. I don't want to deprive the party of their well-developed political instincts. Besides, they contribute so few delegates that they hardly matter, except in regards to momentum, and I would prefer to curb that influence by having them both vote on the same day and then having NV and SC vote the very next week. That would significantly diversify our early-voting electorate and reduce the impact of the two, first-voting (and very white) states (IA and NH).

2. Super Tuesday is a failure. Bust it up. Candidates lack both the money and the time to campaign in all of these states at the same time. It makes no sense to have them all grouped together. Split them up and have them vote two or three at a time, one week apart. That seems fair and it will give our candidates some time to pay attention to the issues that matter to these states.

3. The late-voting states are basically useless to us in selecting our nominee. Again, I prefer 2 or three states per week, every week, all the way through the nominating process. Late-voting states should accelerate their primary and/or caucus dates to start as soon as possible after the current Super Tuesday states vote.

Will this help us choose our nominee sooner? No. In fact, the process I recommend would slow down our selection process a bit. Will this lack of early certainty cause a lot of anxiety? Yes. No doubt, it will. Is it worth it? Yes. I think so. I strongly believe that the votes of a greater and more diverse proportion of the Democratic Party would help us choose a better and stronger candidate for the general election.

Well, that's what I've got to say.



-Laelth

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 31 replies Author Time Post
Algernon Moncrieff Feb 2020 OP
at140 Feb 2020 #1
TwilightZone Feb 2020 #2
csziggy Feb 2020 #21
Kurt V. Feb 2020 #27
DURHAM D Feb 2020 #3
Algernon Moncrieff Feb 2020 #5
PETRUS Feb 2020 #4
lunasun Feb 2020 #11
LiberalFighter Feb 2020 #6
Algernon Moncrieff Feb 2020 #9
LiberalFighter Feb 2020 #24
RhodeIslandOne Feb 2020 #7
honest.abe Feb 2020 #8
lunasun Feb 2020 #10
blm Feb 2020 #12
AleksS Feb 2020 #15
doc03 Feb 2020 #20
LuvLoogie Feb 2020 #13
AncientGeezer Feb 2020 #14
lees1975 Feb 2020 #16
boston bean Feb 2020 #17
whistler162 Feb 2020 #18
gollygee Feb 2020 #19
blm Feb 2020 #22
gollygee Feb 2020 #23
Celerity Feb 2020 #25
Poiuyt Feb 2020 #26
Dagstead Bumwood Feb 2020 #28
Mponti Feb 2020 #29
marlakay Feb 2020 #30
LineNew Reply This is a REALLY tough question.
Laelth Feb 2020 #31
Please login to view edit histories.