Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WaPo Plumline: It was, by any reasonable standards, a staggering, staggering lie. [View all]appal_jack
(3,813 posts)29. He appointed 5 of the 18, including both Simpson & Bowles
Last edited Wed Sep 5, 2012, 11:37 AM - Edit history (1)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Commission_on_Fiscal_Responsibility_and_ReformAccording to the above link, President Obama appointed Alan Simpson (co-chair; fmr. U.S. Senator), Dave M. Cote (Honeywell International), Erskine Bowles (co-chair; fmr. White House Chief of Staff), Andy Stern (fmr. president of Service Employees International Union), Alice Rivlin (Brookings Institution; fmr. director CBO and OMB and Fed vice chair), Ann M. Fudge (fmr. CEO Young & Rubicam Brands), and Bruce Reed (fmr. Chief Domestic Policy Adviser to President Clinton), executive director of Commission.
Both Simpson & Bowles are absolutely inexcusable, unless you enjoy watching demented pitbulls (Simpson) tear apart emotionally stunted chihuahuas (Bowles), who never wanted to fight to begin with. But that seems lousy, even by Michael Vick standards, especially when it's our retirement income that is on the line. Out of the rest, Andy Stern is the only one who reputedly stood against the overarching theme of balancing the budget on the backs of the poor and middle class, reneging on the Social Security bonds, and otherwise further hollowing-out America in the name of a few more years of coddling the 1%.
Additionally,responsibility for the very existence of the Commission lies with Obama (underline emphasis added):
The original proposal for a commission came from bipartisan legislation that would have required Congress to vote on its recommendations as presented, without any amendment. In January 2010, that bill failed in the Senate by a vote of 5346, when six Republicans who had co-sponsored it nevertheless voted against it.
Why did our Democratic President expend precious 1st-year political capital on the false-flag issue of debt reduction at the very time when stimulus and economic recovery were what was needed?
-app
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
WaPo Plumline: It was, by any reasonable standards, a staggering, staggering lie. [View all]
pampango
Sep 2012
OP
As I remember it each party picked their own participants on the Debt Commission.
xtraxritical
Sep 2012
#24
“If you vote against Obama because he can’t get stuff done, it’s kind of like saying ‘This guy can’t
KurtNYC
Sep 2012
#12
So most of the offline Faux consumers have eaten Ryan's Lyin hook, line and sinker...
nightscanner59
Sep 2012
#34