Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Just a thought: Calling & losing a House vote for impeachment would be catastrophic [View all]GeorgeGist
(25,320 posts)29. 218 is enough to impeach.
If 217 Dems plus Amash were on board, as you say, we're already there.
Where do you get the claim " we must gather at least 87 more commitments.. "?
Why must it be by the end of the year?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Just a thought: Calling & losing a House vote for impeachment would be catastrophic [View all]
ehrnst
Sep 2019
OP
EVERYONE should read your post. That's the backstory that many hotheads don't get. Democrats
OnDoutside
Sep 2019
#14
Yep, and this SCOTUS sure as HELL isn't going to invalidate executive privilege. (nt)
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#64
"Super frustrated" isn't reason enough to possibly end our chances of taking back the Senate in 2020
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#67
People remember Clinton's impeachment, and I think that's what they are thinking of. (nt)
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#58
The idea that if the opposing party can do damage to a POTUS for lying about a blow job
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#71
"I don't think there's any way that tRUMP and his minions will survive investigations utilizing
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#74
right. Impeachment is a potential solution at the end of a process. We need to enter and/or
wiggs
Sep 2019
#87
You may not think it will fail, but Pelosi does and I gotta go with her on this one
StarfishSaver
Sep 2019
#34
So there's nothing to be done other than holding a losing vote on impeachment and
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#17
Investigate now. Televised hearings now. Basically what Nadler et al are gearing up to do.
Hekate
Sep 2019
#13
Yes, I think that we forget that those in congress, even in swing districts must be responsive
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#19
The Nixon impeachment hearings weren't televised, so they didn't affect public opinion
StarfishSaver
Sep 2019
#27
You're probably thinking of the Senate hearings held in the summer of 1973
StarfishSaver
Sep 2019
#31
As I've said repeatedly, the first 20 minutes of the first impeachment hearing was televised.
StarfishSaver
Sep 2019
#70
Their job is to impeach when there is a majority that votes for it, as per the constitution.
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#35
History does not support you in the claim that Republicans were willing to remove.
Cuthbert Allgood
Sep 2019
#41
Actually history does support my claim that there were republicans willing to impeach
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#47
Well, that's not something that a lot of the public, even here on DU understands.
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#44
There is enough to vote on a resolution outlining rules for inquiry, and that's scheduled for this
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#42
Just as we would not want to see a Dem impeached on a straight, or near straight, Party line
empedocles
Sep 2019
#73