Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

StarzGuy

(254 posts)
26. Total B_S
Mon Sep 9, 2019, 01:17 AM
Sep 2019

Someone is lying about this and it ain't Politico. I think who ever in the air force approved the trump stay-cation needs to be interviewed. If said person lies about it then he or she needs to be court martialed. Then congress needs to add impeachment charges to the growing list of illegal acts, then impeach the S_O_B.

K&R real Cannabis calm Sep 2019 #1
I'll believe a real "probe" when i feel it. pangaia Sep 2019 #2
K&R. I sure as hell hope the AF leaders will Ilsa Sep 2019 #3
"Probe"? Riiiiiight. Taxpayers and the Constitution are the ones getting fucked. 50 Shades Of Blue Sep 2019 #4
there is no "air force guideline or procedure" that makes it legal to violate the Emoluments Clause Takket Sep 2019 #5
When this first came out, I was pretty sure it wouldn't be an isolated incident. patphil Sep 2019 #6
This actually sounds like a fake scandal... zaj Sep 2019 #7
at Turnberry?????? At Doonbeg? At the Obama Resort and Spa??? LOL EveHammond13 Sep 2019 #9
No, it's true... zaj Sep 2019 #11
What part of "surge" do you not understand? SunSeeker Sep 2019 #13
The problem is the ownership not the refueling there. zaj Sep 2019 #14
The problem is the refueling at a commercial airport when cheaper military airports are available. SunSeeker Sep 2019 #17
Because the Obama administration signed an agreement to... zaj Sep 2019 #18
To have a backup. They normally refueled at cheaper military bases. SunSeeker Sep 2019 #20
talking to that one is pointless I think. EveHammond13 Sep 2019 #32
Who profits from this today? gordianot Sep 2019 #10
Agreed, but makes a big difference that this was planned under Obama zaj Sep 2019 #15
This was NOT planned under Obama. SunSeeker Sep 2019 #24
That isn't evident, that's speculation. zaj Sep 2019 #28
THEY NEVER USED THIS AIRPORT UNDER OBAMA. That's not speculation. SunSeeker Sep 2019 #30
That's speculation... zaj Sep 2019 #34
No it's not. The NYT says refueling started at Prestwick in Oct. of 2017. SunSeeker Sep 2019 #35
I can imagine several that you declare impossible. zaj Sep 2019 #37
"Imaginative" is not the word that comes to mind. SunSeeker Sep 2019 #39
Well... zaj Sep 2019 #40
Your post actually sounds like you get your news from Trump's twitter feed. SunSeeker Sep 2019 #12
Nah, it's in the original NY Times article. zaj Sep 2019 #16
Nah, the NYT article didn't call it a fake scandal. You did. SunSeeker Sep 2019 #19
He said he wasn't clear. I wish we could have simply educated instead of... whatever else happened. NCLefty Sep 2019 #22
... sheshe2 Sep 2019 #23
His ownership is the scandal... zaj Sep 2019 #25
Who decided to use this airport they never used under Obama? And WHY? SunSeeker Sep 2019 #27
I don't know, but questions are not scandal zaj Sep 2019 #29
Needlessly spending $17M on overpriced fuel IS a scandal. There is no question about that. SunSeeker Sep 2019 #33
Maybe, or maybe it was part of a plan that existed under Obama zaj Sep 2019 #36
Well, if you're willing to make up shit about Obama's plans... SunSeeker Sep 2019 #38
The thing about career military they will do decades of service. gordianot Sep 2019 #8
we'll see what happens... myohmy2 Sep 2019 #21
Total B_S StarzGuy Sep 2019 #26
From Natasha Bertrand Gothmog Sep 2019 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Air Force leaders order p...»Reply #26