Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why isn't tRUMP kicked off twitter for good? [View all]MrsCoffee
(5,801 posts)9. Because the algorithm that would ban white nationalist hate speech would also ban most Republicans.
Last edited Mon Jul 29, 2019, 01:07 PM - Edit history (1)
https://washingtonmonthly.com/2019/04/25/twitter-cant-ban-racism-because-theyd-have-to-ban-republicans-too/
In this case, we have something tangible that we can explore. The difficulty of banning white nationalist hate rhetoric from Twitter stems directly from the fact that it would be politically divisive and therefore problematic for the company. The divisiveness doesnt primarily derive from limitations on free speech. While some people are obviously sympathetic to the ideology and actions of ISIS, the number is too small to create a significant backlash when their content is banned. Likewise, relatively few people are supportive of Nazis and Klansmen, and their content would not be missed if it were suddenly absent. The divisiveness in this case arises from the fact that the subjects of the ban have political power.
Any move that could be perceived as being anti-Republican is likely to stir backlash against the company, which has been criticized by President Trump and other prominent Republicans for having an anti-conservative bias.
What this means is that everyone is subjected to hate speech on Twitter solely because there are Republicans who engage in hate speech.
In this case, we have something tangible that we can explore. The difficulty of banning white nationalist hate rhetoric from Twitter stems directly from the fact that it would be politically divisive and therefore problematic for the company. The divisiveness doesnt primarily derive from limitations on free speech. While some people are obviously sympathetic to the ideology and actions of ISIS, the number is too small to create a significant backlash when their content is banned. Likewise, relatively few people are supportive of Nazis and Klansmen, and their content would not be missed if it were suddenly absent. The divisiveness in this case arises from the fact that the subjects of the ban have political power.
Any move that could be perceived as being anti-Republican is likely to stir backlash against the company, which has been criticized by President Trump and other prominent Republicans for having an anti-conservative bias.
What this means is that everyone is subjected to hate speech on Twitter solely because there are Republicans who engage in hate speech.
Oh, and because Dorsey likes being a billionaire. Banning hate speech would seriously affect the bottom line.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Red Don would have been TO'd from 90% of modded forums on the internet for his crap
uponit7771
Jul 2019
#3
This is his white privilege. Twitter is a corporate entity run by wealthy corporatists.
OrlandoDem2
Jul 2019
#4
The justice department claims that he can't be kicked off for any reason ...
marble falls
Jul 2019
#6
You know what they say, the bigger the sitting asshole, the smaller the "indictment".
marble falls
Jul 2019
#10
Because the algorithm that would ban white nationalist hate speech would also ban most Republicans.
MrsCoffee
Jul 2019
#9
He is a constant advertisement for them and the best thing that has ever happened for their business
cbdo2007
Jul 2019
#11
Could the State of California or someone like that open an investigation into Twitter promoting hate
cbdo2007
Jul 2019
#14
Only if it's considered to be creating an immediate threat of violence.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jul 2019
#28
Which doesn't mean a thing, actually, we need the standards for the President to be *higher*
ck4829
Jul 2019
#25