Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hlthe2b

(102,216 posts)
7. Oh, no, Gillibrand didn't act to force him out at all... not at all. BS--see below:
Mon Jul 22, 2019, 03:22 PM
Jul 2019

As reported by NYMagazine's Jane Mayer this morning in her indepth expose':
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/29/the-case-of-al-franken


Minutes after Politico posted the story, Senator Gillibrand’s chief of staff called Franken’s to say that Gillibrand was going to demand his resignation. Franken was stung by Gillibrand’s failure to call him personally. They had been friends and squash partners. In a later call, Gillibrand’s chief of staff offered to have Gillibrand speak with Franken, but by that time Franken was frantically conferring with his staff and his family. Franken’s office proposed that Franken’s daughter speak with Gillibrand instead, but Gillibrand declined.

Gillibrand then went on Facebook and posted her demand that Franken resign: “Enough is enough. The women who have come forward are brave and I believe them. While it’s true that his behavior is not the same as the criminal conduct alleged against Roy Moore, or Harvey Weinstein, or President Trump, it is still unquestionably wrong, and should not be tolerated.”

Minutes later, at a previously scheduled press conference, Gillibrand added insult to injury: she reiterated her call for Franken to resign while also trumpeting her sponsorship of a new bill that banned mandatory arbitration of sexual-harassment claims. She didn’t mention that Franken had originated the legislation—and had given it to Gillibrand to sponsor, out of concern that it might be imperilled by his scandal.




AND from your own NYDAILY News article from the OP:
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) was the first Democratic senator to call for Franken’s head after the #MeToo allegations first surfaced against him. The allegations quickly snowballed and several female senators told Schumer they wanted action against Franken.

Schumer may well have delivered the final blow, but not until Gillbrand got everyone enlisted in the lynch mob action. I will NEVER forgive her for that nor forget
He did NOT fondle her breasts. His hands never touched her. It was a jokey pretense. nt tblue37 Jul 2019 #1
Isn't that something? madaboutharry Jul 2019 #20
+1 LuckyCharms Jul 2019 #30
She was wearing a freaking FLAK JACKET. trof Jul 2019 #47
Yes. That was the basis of the joke. MontanaMama Jul 2019 #53
The author made that false statement --she wasn't quoting Schumer when she said it. nt tblue37 Jul 2019 #64
Read the New Yorker piece on the lynching of Franken. GoneOffShore Jul 2019 #86
I don't know much about the other accusations... Bradical79 Jul 2019 #84
I'd love to know how any breast can be fondled with a flack jacket on. Vinca Jul 2019 #2
a "secret meeting?" LOL n/t leftstreet Jul 2019 #3
I Have To Agree Me. Jul 2019 #4
agreed cilla4progress Jul 2019 #21
When He Stood With Netanyahu Me. Jul 2019 #26
That did it for me too. yardwork Jul 2019 #61
I also agree. I've disliked him for years. Grins Jul 2019 #42
He's a mealymouth. trof Jul 2019 #48
So Schumer engineered the whole thing? BeyondGeography Jul 2019 #5
He' the only one Trumpocalypse Jul 2019 #40
I don't mean to ... uh .... downplay it ... mr_lebowski Jul 2019 #6
It wasn't even clear if he was touching her -- his hand was between her and the camera, but ... eppur_se_muova Jul 2019 #9
Others on that flight said she wasn't asleep, but pretending to be for the photo. Texin Jul 2019 #54
Based on the photo he was not even touching her. LiberalFighter Jul 2019 #51
He was railroaded. Im still upset with the dems that did it. Joe941 Jul 2019 #89
Oh, no, Gillibrand didn't act to force him out at all... not at all. BS--see below: hlthe2b Jul 2019 #7
That is exactly what happened, and Gillibrand admitted as much still_one Jul 2019 #11
thanks, that's pretty much what I remember. Nt BootinUp Jul 2019 #15
agree - and I posted some other excerpts that I think are compelling. nt spooky3 Jul 2019 #17
Someone needs to ask her about this at the next debate: sdfernando Jul 2019 #28
They should ask her nothing Trenzalore Jul 2019 #35
I hope she is not on the debate stage demtenjeep Jul 2019 #37
They drop out when the money runs out Trenzalore Jul 2019 #43
He was ACTING!!!...hamming it up for the camera. Very cowardly of Schumer. Easier to Karadeniz Jul 2019 #8
Rather rely on this second-hand report, you may want to read spooky3 Jul 2019 #10
Which happened first, Gillibrand or Schumer? drbtg1 Jul 2019 #12
The Mayer article makes it clear that Gillibrand's abandonment of Franken preceded Schumer's klook Jul 2019 #38
Yeah, that's how I read it too. It seemed Schumer was only reacting to the maelstrom created... drbtg1 Jul 2019 #88
There was an element of removing a competitor in the Democratic party PufPuf23 Jul 2019 #13
Except that Franken never talked about running for President... brooklynite Jul 2019 #19
So what? Who said that they did? PufPuf23 Jul 2019 #32
YOU just accused Gillibrand of targeting Franken to eliminate a Presidential opponent... brooklynite Jul 2019 #33
Suggest you re-read what I wrote with some nuance. PufPuf23 Jul 2019 #45
Schumer was affraid of Franken from day one. Wellstone ruled Jul 2019 #14
Anyone who has read Al's book should know FakeNoose Jul 2019 #29
As a Minnesotan MrsMatt Jul 2019 #55
We need to move on & stand United against the Right dustyscamp Jul 2019 #16
And I hate it we let them get their way. N/T DFW Jul 2019 #23
The Right wants to eliminate our best and brightest, and in this case they succeeded. Crunchy Frog Jul 2019 #50
I know he was a good man in a bad position. He should have had a fair hearing, but it's too late now dustyscamp Jul 2019 #66
I'm not setting aside my bitterness about this anytime soon. Crunchy Frog Jul 2019 #74
Good lawd, read the original article. demmiblue Jul 2019 #18
beneath him...no it is the essense of him questionseverything Jul 2019 #71
The Daily News is not a "Right Wing Rag"...you're perhaps thinking of the New York Post? brooklynite Jul 2019 #79
I heard that on the Bill Press show at the time. Peregrine Took Jul 2019 #22
I think I will have anger management issues about UpInArms Jul 2019 #24
I always knew it was Schumer. yardwork Jul 2019 #25
This links to a much longer New Yorker article by Jane Mayer... TreasonousBastard Jul 2019 #27
Gillibrand decided to run for an office that gives everyone a chance to vote for her or not. usaf-vet Jul 2019 #60
She literally made a campaign ad boasting about her role eissa Jul 2019 #31
Yep and... Duppers Jul 2019 #34
let's make a list of the major wins Schumer has secured for us EveHammond13 Jul 2019 #36
Here's how Schumer negotiates... tandem5 Jul 2019 #68
that's about right. also: am I still invited to the cocktail party later? EveHammond13 Jul 2019 #73
Definitely -- Just because the Republicans are trying to kill us all tandem5 Jul 2019 #85
Very long but good article in New Yorker about all of this. BigmanPigman Jul 2019 #39
Time for chuck to go! Greyhead Jul 2019 #41
It's always been my understanding that Schumer was the mastermind, while KG chose to assume the role Crunchy Frog Jul 2019 #44
+1 PDittie Jul 2019 #56
Franken says he 'absolutely' regrets resigning from Senate PufPuf23 Jul 2019 #46
this is a highly suspicious article in light of Jane Mayer's SleeplessinSoCal Jul 2019 #49
Then two NY senators need to be replaced. TheCowsCameHome Jul 2019 #52
The big democratic donors are well aware of what she did, which is why her fundraising from them has mn9driver Jul 2019 #57
Meanwhile we have a admitted sexual preditor in the WH and the people doc03 Jul 2019 #58
Schumer is part of the problem budkin Jul 2019 #59
Harry Reid made a big mistake in choosing him dalton99a Jul 2019 #83
I have pointed out many times. Blue_true Jul 2019 #62
While I don't trust Mr Nuggets Jul 2019 #63
This message was self-deleted by its author ProfessionalLeft Jul 2019 #65
"Schumer refused to allow him to present his side" ... Bullshit Azathoth Jul 2019 #67
Why was Chuck Schummer sitting at Franken's bedside? Ms. Toad Jul 2019 #69
Meeting at Schumer's DC apartment. Franken's wife Franni there too. IADEMO2004 Jul 2019 #76
Fondling her breasts? - WTF?... lame54 Jul 2019 #70
If true, I have to ask Retrograde Jul 2019 #72
All so we could be more moral or whatever TheFarseer Jul 2019 #75
Wait until Franken responds rufus dog Jul 2019 #77
So, you're saying that the article Franken was interviewed for was false? brooklynite Jul 2019 #78
I read the whole thing. MAYER's word is gold. That said, when so much has to be said, it's over. UTUSN Jul 2019 #80
Sounds suspicious n/t 3c273a Jul 2019 #81
"to present his side of a damning photo" only covers one of the situations Tarc Jul 2019 #82
Perhaps you should read the New Yorker article. GoneOffShore Jul 2019 #87
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Al Franken was pushed out...»Reply #7