Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UTUSN

(70,675 posts)
11. No source for credibility? Google shows multiple news items citing "credibility"
Tue Jul 9, 2019, 02:25 PM
Jul 2019

Reuters, Daily Beast, Politico, more. That his credibility was the reason for extending the probe.






K&R for visibility. nt tblue37 Jul 2019 #1
"CREDIBLE" - of course! UTUSN Jul 2019 #2
No source for that. former9thward Jul 2019 #8
No source for credibility? Google shows multiple news items citing "credibility" UTUSN Jul 2019 #11
There is no source in the OP at all for what the investigators "thought." former9thward Jul 2019 #22
The end result of investigations is what the investigators thought. UTUSN Jul 2019 #24
That's Mueller fault. Mueller is a big disappointment to his country. A typical far right republican rockfordfile Jul 2019 #20
Credible in a Wikipedia way. sir pball Jul 2019 #21
And Mueller said there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. former9thward Jul 2019 #23
There was no collusion, in the legal sense. sir pball Jul 2019 #26
K & R for visibility .... n/t MFGsunny Jul 2019 #3
Here's What The Politico Report Says Me. Jul 2019 #4
Correct, does politico has an contact email? Perseus Jul 2019 #7
Repubs hired Fusion, but ... stopdiggin Jul 2019 #14
To My Mind NO, As It Was Part Of A Continuum Started By THe Cons Me. Jul 2019 #25
for the most part I agree stopdiggin Jul 2019 #31
Where is the source that Steele was only involved with the Dam side of things JonLP24 Jul 2019 #33
there are several available chronologies. all agree stopdiggin Jul 2019 #35
Nice catch Roland99 Jul 2019 #28
Barr will still try and spin this Fiendish Thingy Jul 2019 #5
Is this part of Trump/Barr's "counter Mueller investigation"? Proud Liberal Dem Jul 2019 #6
which one? NewJeffCT Jul 2019 #13
I guess whichever one would be potentially looking at Steele Proud Liberal Dem Jul 2019 #17
I believe it was. We all know those are exercises in futility Roland99 Jul 2019 #30
We need to see the un-redacted version of the Steele dossier FakeNoose Jul 2019 #9
been available for quite a while Hermit-The-Prog Jul 2019 #32
Yes those are the redacted version FakeNoose Jul 2019 #34
some details will be distorted and leaked to limbaugh, who will ensure this goes their way certainot Jul 2019 #10
This is laughable, Scarsdale Jul 2019 #12
I bet Limbaugh has ties to Epstein nt maryellen99 Jul 2019 #18
Only if Scarsdale Jul 2019 #19
Jeff Christie does what? Raster Jul 2019 #27
Would love to see the transcript elias7 Jul 2019 #15
Nadler needs to subpoena it. triron Jul 2019 #16
K&R onecaliberal Jul 2019 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chris Steele (dossier) wa...»Reply #11