Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

former9thward

(31,969 posts)
8. No source for that.
Tue Jul 9, 2019, 01:51 PM
Jul 2019

The FBI fired him in 2016 because he could not stop talking to the media. Mueller mentions Steele in one footnote in 400 pages. He did not rely on him.

K&R for visibility. nt tblue37 Jul 2019 #1
"CREDIBLE" - of course! UTUSN Jul 2019 #2
No source for that. former9thward Jul 2019 #8
No source for credibility? Google shows multiple news items citing "credibility" UTUSN Jul 2019 #11
There is no source in the OP at all for what the investigators "thought." former9thward Jul 2019 #22
The end result of investigations is what the investigators thought. UTUSN Jul 2019 #24
That's Mueller fault. Mueller is a big disappointment to his country. A typical far right republican rockfordfile Jul 2019 #20
Credible in a Wikipedia way. sir pball Jul 2019 #21
And Mueller said there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. former9thward Jul 2019 #23
There was no collusion, in the legal sense. sir pball Jul 2019 #26
K & R for visibility .... n/t MFGsunny Jul 2019 #3
Here's What The Politico Report Says Me. Jul 2019 #4
Correct, does politico has an contact email? Perseus Jul 2019 #7
Repubs hired Fusion, but ... stopdiggin Jul 2019 #14
To My Mind NO, As It Was Part Of A Continuum Started By THe Cons Me. Jul 2019 #25
for the most part I agree stopdiggin Jul 2019 #31
Where is the source that Steele was only involved with the Dam side of things JonLP24 Jul 2019 #33
there are several available chronologies. all agree stopdiggin Jul 2019 #35
Nice catch Roland99 Jul 2019 #28
Barr will still try and spin this Fiendish Thingy Jul 2019 #5
Is this part of Trump/Barr's "counter Mueller investigation"? Proud Liberal Dem Jul 2019 #6
which one? NewJeffCT Jul 2019 #13
I guess whichever one would be potentially looking at Steele Proud Liberal Dem Jul 2019 #17
I believe it was. We all know those are exercises in futility Roland99 Jul 2019 #30
We need to see the un-redacted version of the Steele dossier FakeNoose Jul 2019 #9
been available for quite a while Hermit-The-Prog Jul 2019 #32
Yes those are the redacted version FakeNoose Jul 2019 #34
some details will be distorted and leaked to limbaugh, who will ensure this goes their way certainot Jul 2019 #10
This is laughable, Scarsdale Jul 2019 #12
I bet Limbaugh has ties to Epstein nt maryellen99 Jul 2019 #18
Only if Scarsdale Jul 2019 #19
Jeff Christie does what? Raster Jul 2019 #27
Would love to see the transcript elias7 Jul 2019 #15
Nadler needs to subpoena it. triron Jul 2019 #16
K&R onecaliberal Jul 2019 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chris Steele (dossier) wa...»Reply #8