Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevermypresident

(781 posts)
54. If you want me to believe that most of the other 185 Democrats in the House
Wed Jun 12, 2019, 12:30 PM
Jun 2019

are truly against impeachment, sorry I don't buy it.

How many times has it been reported than Pelosi has had meetings and conference calls with her caucus regarding impeachment?

You don't think she has stressed the importance of presenting a unified front, tried to sway pro-impeachment Democrats to hold the line (just like Nadler), etc.?!?

Naivete...

AGAIN, that's how it works, in REALITY.

I only hope we have the opportunity in the near future, to see how a majority of those other 185 Democrats publicly come out for impeachment if Nancy does.

Discouraging is an understatement. Damn, they already have the strongest case triron Jun 2019 #1
She spoke the truth. DURHAM D Jun 2019 #2
Her caucus is looking to HER for leadership. If and when Pelosi says go, a substantial Nevermypresident Jun 2019 #6
That's NOT how it works. She can be a closer for the last ten or twenty stragglers, pnwmom Jun 2019 #7
It has occurred to me that many house members Control-Z Jun 2019 #11
She's counting. When it gets close we might see a sudden flood of them. pnwmom Jun 2019 #13
Who knew so many were unable to read a report? cwydro Jun 2019 #37
Half the voters have an IQ below 100. And many of them probably feel stretched pnwmom Jun 2019 #39
I was talking about members of Congress. cwydro Jun 2019 #42
these 3 Rethugs would be lucky to crack 100 combined Celerity Jun 2019 #47
Lots of citizens have not will / not read the report. Captain Zero Jun 2019 #63
I agree that hearings with Mueller himself could help. And I myself would like to ask pnwmom Jun 2019 #65
61 Representatives currently support an impeachment inquiry in the House. SunSeeker Jun 2019 #16
Their constituents are made up of people from all parties and no party, not just Democrats. pnwmom Jun 2019 #20
Astute 👏🏼👍🏼 arthritisR_US Jun 2019 #22
Since when is it "astute" for a Dem rep to not listen to 76% of Dems? SunSeeker Jun 2019 #24
She always is StarfishSaver Jun 2019 #60
Dem reps should do what 76% of Dems want. SunSeeker Jun 2019 #23
No, that's not true. All Representatives are supposed to be representing their whole district. pnwmom Jun 2019 #25
What's not true? Voting for the rule of law IS representing all your constituents. SunSeeker Jun 2019 #50
How many of those 24% watoos Jun 2019 #29
Well put. cwydro Jun 2019 #38
It's not 24 percent of Dems that matter. pnwmom Jun 2019 #40
Yes. Motives for not supporting impeachment Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #43
If you want me to believe that most of the other 185 Democrats in the House Nevermypresident Jun 2019 #54
Do they have minds of their own? treestar Jun 2019 #34
+1000 yardwork Jun 2019 #15
I agree appears demoralizing, but the numbers change every day AND elleng Jun 2019 #3
Yes, up to 61. But there are 235 Dems. I suppose Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #44
her job to rally them Skittles Jun 2019 #4
I don't know what more evidence they could be looking for. trev Jun 2019 #5
The fully unredacted Mueller Report, the underlying evidence, factual witnesses turning up to give OnDoutside Jun 2019 #21
The state of NY offered Trump's tax returns watoos Jun 2019 #30
House chairman declined to take them....for now. He is utterly entitled to receive Trump's tax OnDoutside Jun 2019 #35
Don't understand...what bad precedent is Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #45
It would mean that a president can say "I don't have to comply with congressional oversight," emmaverybo Jun 2019 #58
K&R, There's a bunch of Democrats who are not listening to facts or their constituents uponit7771 Jun 2019 #8
I remembrer the stand-up job she did, leading on impeachment for 3Hotdogs Jun 2019 #9
I think she is smarter about this than any of us. wasupaloopa Jun 2019 #10
Who's going to watch a hearing with no witnesses and no Mueller? SunSeeker Jun 2019 #17
Glad you said that, because I wanted to say the same thing. Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #46
Here's the link of the Mathews Swallwell interview Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #48
The vote for contempt was just taken yesterday. True Blue American Jun 2019 #27
Republicans are laughing at civil contempt watoos Jun 2019 #31
They are also calling the first witnesses Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #41
Where in the Constitution does it state that you should only impeach if you know up front whether diva77 Jun 2019 #12
History agrees with you, watoos Jun 2019 #32
Timing is everything. Nancy knows what she's doing. yardwork Jun 2019 #14
Agree! True Blue American Jun 2019 #28
If we had a free press they could be grilling GOP senators. MasonDreams Jun 2019 #18
There are Impeachment Rallies this weekend to try to convince BigmanPigman Jun 2019 #19
I'm going to the one in Vancouver. trev Jun 2019 #51
GOOD! BigmanPigman Jun 2019 #67
We need hearings True Blue American Jun 2019 #26
Why can't the hearings be impeachment hearings watoos Jun 2019 #33
Because the Republican witnesses are certainly flocking to testify. trev Jun 2019 #52
McGahn, Barr, Hicks, et Al are just waiting for them to be called impeachment hearings StarfishSaver Jun 2019 #61
"He's so strict." trev Jun 2019 #64
That would work if the hearings were televised in the way impeachment hearings would be. Vinca Jun 2019 #36
You think the "cult members" will watch the hearings in the middle of the day because CNN and MSNBC StarfishSaver Jun 2019 #62
Not at all. :) WHEN IT IS TIME, Pelosi and team will say so, Hortensis Jun 2019 #49
"Most members of congress want to impeach" trev Jun 2019 #56
Excuse me, most DEMOCRATIC members of congress of course. Hortensis Jun 2019 #57
Yes, I knew we were talking about Democrats. trev Jun 2019 #59
Fear HopeAgain Jun 2019 #53
'Only thing we have to fear, is fear itself' Baclava Jun 2019 #66
Don't worry, I'm sure she's all torn up about it BeyondGeography Jun 2019 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Beyond utterly demoralizi...»Reply #54