General Discussion

Nevermypresident

(781 posts)

6. Her caucus is looking to HER for leadership. If and when Pelosi says go, a substantial

Reply to DURHAM D (Reply #2)

Wed Jun 12, 2019, 12:17 AM

Jun 2019

majority of them will publicly say they're for impeachment, IMO.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

67 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Beyond utterly demoralizing and sad, what Pelosi said [View all] Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 OP

Discouraging is an understatement. Damn, they already have the strongest case triron Jun 2019 #1

She spoke the truth. DURHAM D Jun 2019 #2

Her caucus is looking to HER for leadership. If and when Pelosi says go, a substantial Nevermypresident Jun 2019 #6

That's NOT how it works. She can be a closer for the last ten or twenty stragglers, pnwmom Jun 2019 #7

It has occurred to me that many house members Control-Z Jun 2019 #11

She's counting. When it gets close we might see a sudden flood of them. pnwmom Jun 2019 #13

Who knew so many were unable to read a report? cwydro Jun 2019 #37

Half the voters have an IQ below 100. And many of them probably feel stretched pnwmom Jun 2019 #39

I was talking about members of Congress. cwydro Jun 2019 #42

these 3 Rethugs would be lucky to crack 100 combined Celerity Jun 2019 #47

Lots of citizens have not will / not read the report. Captain Zero Jun 2019 #63

I agree that hearings with Mueller himself could help. And I myself would like to ask pnwmom Jun 2019 #65

61 Representatives currently support an impeachment inquiry in the House. SunSeeker Jun 2019 #16

Their constituents are made up of people from all parties and no party, not just Democrats. pnwmom Jun 2019 #20

Astute 👏🏼👍🏼 arthritisR_US Jun 2019 #22

Since when is it "astute" for a Dem rep to not listen to 76% of Dems? SunSeeker Jun 2019 #24

She always is StarfishSaver Jun 2019 #60

Dem reps should do what 76% of Dems want. SunSeeker Jun 2019 #23

No, that's not true. All Representatives are supposed to be representing their whole district. pnwmom Jun 2019 #25

What's not true? Voting for the rule of law IS representing all your constituents. SunSeeker Jun 2019 #50

How many of those 24% watoos Jun 2019 #29

Well put. cwydro Jun 2019 #38

It's not 24 percent of Dems that matter. pnwmom Jun 2019 #40

Yes. Motives for not supporting impeachment Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #43

If you want me to believe that most of the other 185 Democrats in the House Nevermypresident Jun 2019 #54

Do they have minds of their own? treestar Jun 2019 #34

+1000 yardwork Jun 2019 #15

I agree appears demoralizing, but the numbers change every day AND elleng Jun 2019 #3

Yes, up to 61. But there are 235 Dems. I suppose Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #44

her job to rally them Skittles Jun 2019 #4

I don't know what more evidence they could be looking for. trev Jun 2019 #5

The fully unredacted Mueller Report, the underlying evidence, factual witnesses turning up to give OnDoutside Jun 2019 #21

The state of NY offered Trump's tax returns watoos Jun 2019 #30

House chairman declined to take them....for now. He is utterly entitled to receive Trump's tax OnDoutside Jun 2019 #35

Don't understand...what bad precedent is Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #45

It would mean that a president can say "I don't have to comply with congressional oversight," emmaverybo Jun 2019 #58

K&R, There's a bunch of Democrats who are not listening to facts or their constituents uponit7771 Jun 2019 #8

I remembrer the stand-up job she did, leading on impeachment for 3Hotdogs Jun 2019 #9

I think she is smarter about this than any of us. wasupaloopa Jun 2019 #10

Who's going to watch a hearing with no witnesses and no Mueller? SunSeeker Jun 2019 #17

Glad you said that, because I wanted to say the same thing. Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #46

Here's the link of the Mathews Swallwell interview Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #48

The vote for contempt was just taken yesterday. True Blue American Jun 2019 #27

Republicans are laughing at civil contempt watoos Jun 2019 #31

They are also calling the first witnesses Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #41

Where in the Constitution does it state that you should only impeach if you know up front whether diva77 Jun 2019 #12

History agrees with you, watoos Jun 2019 #32

Timing is everything. Nancy knows what she's doing. yardwork Jun 2019 #14

Agree! True Blue American Jun 2019 #28

If we had a free press they could be grilling GOP senators. MasonDreams Jun 2019 #18

There are Impeachment Rallies this weekend to try to convince BigmanPigman Jun 2019 #19

I'm going to the one in Vancouver. trev Jun 2019 #51

GOOD! BigmanPigman Jun 2019 #67

We need hearings True Blue American Jun 2019 #26

Why can't the hearings be impeachment hearings watoos Jun 2019 #33

Because the Republican witnesses are certainly flocking to testify. trev Jun 2019 #52

McGahn, Barr, Hicks, et Al are just waiting for them to be called impeachment hearings StarfishSaver Jun 2019 #61

"He's so strict." trev Jun 2019 #64

That would work if the hearings were televised in the way impeachment hearings would be. Vinca Jun 2019 #36

You think the "cult members" will watch the hearings in the middle of the day because CNN and MSNBC StarfishSaver Jun 2019 #62

Not at all. :) WHEN IT IS TIME, Pelosi and team will say so, Hortensis Jun 2019 #49

"Most members of congress want to impeach" trev Jun 2019 #56

Excuse me, most DEMOCRATIC members of congress of course. Hortensis Jun 2019 #57

Yes, I knew we were talking about Democrats. trev Jun 2019 #59

Fear HopeAgain Jun 2019 #53

'Only thing we have to fear, is fear itself' Baclava Jun 2019 #66

Don't worry, I'm sure she's all torn up about it BeyondGeography Jun 2019 #55