Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 91 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Apple vs Samsung: Jurors ...»Reply #15
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Apple vs Samsung: Jurors talk to media about their deliberations, sound like absolute idiots [View all]
 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
15. I don't know if they did award damages on patents found to be non-infringing
Reply to stranger81 (Reply #13)
Mon Aug 27, 2012, 02:38 PM
Aug 2012

If they did then the damages get tossed as inconsistent.

TopBack to the top of the page AlertAlert this post for a rule violation ShareGet links to this post PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
  EditCannot edit other people's posts RecommendRecommend this post ReplyReply to this post

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Apple vs Samsung: Jurors talk to media about their deliberations, sound like absolute idiots [View all] Poll_Blind Aug 2012 OP
OMG!! "In fact we skipped that one, so we could go on faster. It was bogging us down." uponit7771 Aug 2012 #1
both sides choose the jury. spanone Aug 2012 #2
Neither Apple's nor Samsung's lawyers bear responsibility for this kind of epic fuckup. Poll_Blind Aug 2012 #6
You do realize the trial and appellate courts don't look at what jurors say afterward, do you? AngryAmish Aug 2012 #8
But it's not just what the jurors said afterward- that's the point of the articles at Groklaw: Poll_Blind Aug 2012 #10
Most of the time juries don't read the instructions AngryAmish Aug 2012 #16
But appellate courts do look at what the jury did in the verdict form. stranger81 Aug 2012 #13
I don't know if they did award damages on patents found to be non-infringing AngryAmish Aug 2012 #15
I don't want to take sides... FreeJoe Aug 2012 #3
Surprise, surprise, an Apple hater not liking the verdict handed down MadHound Aug 2012 #4
The Apple shorts don't like it for sure. /nt still_one Aug 2012 #5
+100 Ezlivin Aug 2012 #7
Not about Apple or Samsung: It's about a jury that isn't heeding the judge's instructions and... Poll_Blind Aug 2012 #9
Well, at least you're being honest with yourself and the rest of us MadHound Aug 2012 #11
Which is why I brought that fact up twice in my own, still unedited, OP when I wrote it. Poll_Blind Aug 2012 #12
Like I said before, I congratulate you for being honest about your extreme bias against Apple MadHound Aug 2012 #17
I'm not entirely adverse to adressing hypothetical situations but, honestly, any second jury... Poll_Blind Aug 2012 #18
This is only a pyrrhic victory for Apple dipsydoodle Aug 2012 #14
Dumbing down the populace only means more of this... JFN1 Aug 2012 #19
The intent of Voir Dire is to ensure Riftaxe Aug 2012 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Apple vs Samsung: Jurors ...»Reply #15
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2024 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.