Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Nadler: "One way or the other" [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)24. Tell us how that would be done, without a trial? Congress isn't a judicial branch.
And one needs criminal, rather than civil charges we have, to merit the perp walk you crave.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
+1 Too many folks have time to complain, but not time to learn how the process works...
CaptainTruth
May 2019
#16
Well, I guess that's a step up from pasting in that Tom Steyer ad again bashing Democrats.
ehrnst
May 2019
#110
They still think ad homs via derision is the way to show people how things should work.
uponit7771
May 2019
#30
Impeachment doesn't allow "Democrats to get all the documentation they need"
StarfishSaver
May 2019
#37
I like your explanation, but I have also read of the benefits of impeachment at this point
Perseus
May 2019
#55
The attention and priority a judge gives to a case based on where it arose is all up to that judge
StarfishSaver
May 2019
#63
Impeachment doesn't give any more authority to house than most other process's ... it doesn't, even
uponit7771
May 2019
#49
These guys are playing into the Democrats' hands. Analysis is that Nadler WANTED McGahn....
George II
May 2019
#3
" Analysis is that Nadler WANTED McGahn.... View profile ....to be a no-show"
awesomerwb1
May 2019
#47
I love Rev. Al, but he's an activist and commentator. His job is to press from the outside
StarfishSaver
May 2019
#54
Do you know the process necessary to "start arresting people for fucks sake"?
StarfishSaver
May 2019
#18
Tell us how that would be done, without a trial? Congress isn't a judicial branch.
ehrnst
May 2019
#24
Start with prosecuting Barr... Then McGahan... Then Devos...then Bolton... Then ...
world wide wally
May 2019
#14
Congress has not authority to "prosecute." That's an executive branch function
StarfishSaver
May 2019
#19
The one way or the other being...we will wait around and hope the voting system is corrected.
Chin music
May 2019
#28
OK, so there is the current ongoing process, which apparently isn't satisfactory.
MGKrebs
May 2019
#98
How exactly do you propose they proceed to "get on with the damn arrests, fines, etc."?
StarfishSaver
May 2019
#50
Assuming that YOU have actually done the research, could you kindly post the process for us?
BamaRefugee
May 2019
#97
GREAT STUFF! thanks so much. I figured at some point the US Marshals HAD to be involved.
BamaRefugee
May 2019
#111
Interesting convo on the Hartmann show about tRump ignoring everything, including the
yaesu
May 2019
#70
At the least, they should be in civil court this afternoon, seeking penalties/remedies from the
vsrazdem
May 2019
#84
He's impressive. I can see why he's the Chairman of this important committee. nt
Honeycombe8
May 2019
#116
One way or another I'm gonna getcha, I'll getcha, I'll getcha getcha getcha getcha. nt
UniteFightBack
May 2019
#117