Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
24. The data exists, but you just can't share it?
Wed May 15, 2019, 01:54 PM
May 2019

Gotcha.

And no, "reducing the acceleration" is not "slowing down". In fact it is the exact opposite of that. If you are still accelerating, you are still going faster. You have to DEcelerate in order to "slow down".


I remember hearing similar from RWers when their came an announcement during the Obama administration that the recession was over, and they howled that they weren't seeing it in their paycheck. Telling them that recession had a specific meaning was lost on them.

Global warming didn't appear overnight, and it will not disappear overnight. Apprently you didn't read all the way through:

No, nothing is going to be enough — even eliminating all greenhouse gasses tomorrow would leave the planet dangerously overheated.


But the Green New Deal is nowhere close to overcoming either the technocratic challenge of designing workable policies to fulfill its grand designs, or the political challenge of enacting them.


Your view is that any plan acceptable to you would have to do those things (which you seem to think that this Green New Deal is capable of - when you can't even find data to back up your claims about the efficacy of previous efforts) and anything that accomplished less would be "wasting time." And that it's EITHER solve it ENTIRELY (not really possible), or give up ENTIRELY, only working on adjusting to the changes that are coming.

In your straw man argument that "nostalgia" is what looking at what Obama did before, you clearly missed this part of the article...

A scaled-up version of Obama’s model, by contrast, is workable. Democrats might have to alter the rules for what kinds of spending the Senate allows to pass with 50 votes to allow for green energy subsidies. That will be a hard task when the 50th Senate vote comes from a red state, but not as hard as getting that 50th vote to approve a revolutionary overhaul of the entire economy. It’s not impossible to imagine a Joe Manchin or a Kyrsten Sinema approving a bill to deploy lots of new green energy infrastructure if it included enough investment for their states.


I highly recommend reading the article before refuting it.

Let us know when you find that data concerning the "lack of efficacy" of the Obama administration policies.

I doubt that it will be any more forthcoming than the 'proof' that Obama 'made the economy worse than it would have been had he done nothing' that I heard from my RWers on social media.

yeah qazplm135 May 2019 #1
I'll take "done" over being promised the moon any day. ehrnst May 2019 #3
No, it didn't "work" zipplewrath May 2019 #2
So tell us what would have "created the kind of reversals that were and are needed" ehrnst May 2019 #4
No, that's the point zipplewrath May 2019 #5
Actually, many things Obama did worked. Did you read the article at all before responding? ehrnst May 2019 #7
No zipplewrath May 2019 #8
Let's go through this again... ehrnst May 2019 #10
Okay zipplewrath May 2019 #16
Ok... ehrnst May 2019 #18
The data exists zipplewrath May 2019 #20
The data exists, but you just can't share it? ehrnst May 2019 #24
I've read it zipplewrath May 2019 #34
"Because working on a politically achievable policy that isn't a solution is a waste of time. " ehrnst May 2019 #37
This is all that the so-called "green new deal" is: George II May 2019 #6
It's a commitment to pursue those goals. MGKrebs May 2019 #9
Legislation requires more specificity as to what is mean by pursuing those goals. ehrnst May 2019 #11
Well then why such vitriol about it? MGKrebs May 2019 #13
The vitriol that I see is coming from those who see it as the ehrnst May 2019 #21
He wanted it to get the floor so they could vote it down without hearings. marylandblue May 2019 #14
So far it's a resolution, but the goal is very clear. marylandblue May 2019 #12
The resolution isn't going to have much in the way of teeth. ehrnst May 2019 #15
Good money after bad. zipplewrath May 2019 #17
Don't make perfect the enemy of good ehrnst May 2019 #19
Far from about perfect zipplewrath May 2019 #22
So you've changed your views since this thread started? ehrnst May 2019 #26
No zipplewrath May 2019 #35
It's got a better track record that anything newly proposed. ehrnst May 2019 #36
No it doesn't zipplewrath May 2019 #39
Where is the data that shows Obama's policies did 'nothing'? ehrnst May 2019 #40
I didn't say that zipplewrath May 2019 #41
Changing your tune when you are called out on it... ehrnst May 2019 #42
Nope - Your own words: ehrnst May 2019 #43
They didn't zipplewrath May 2019 #44
That's not a retraction of what you said. ehrnst May 2019 #45
It was insufficient zipplewrath May 2019 #46
Yup, doing "something" that won't make a noticeable difference is worse than nothing. marylandblue May 2019 #23
How do we know that this one isn't, to use that suddenly taboo word, "moderate"? We know nothing.... George II May 2019 #25
I don't have a problem with the word "moderate" marylandblue May 2019 #29
If they are not pursuing "IMPEACHMENT" at full volume 24/7 then they get trashed for not ehrnst May 2019 #30
Thanks for the info. I am glad there is some movement, and I'll read the bill later. marylandblue May 2019 #31
There have been at least two House hearings on climate change: George II May 2019 #32
Thanks. Not getting the attention it deserves, even among us political junkies on DU. marylandblue May 2019 #33
He had a good healthcare plan, as a starter, excellent comprehensive immigration reform plan, emmaverybo May 2019 #27
K&R for reality mcar May 2019 #28
K&R betsuni May 2019 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama Had a Green New Dea...»Reply #24