Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)

9. That's my understanding. Similar to an admission of guilt.

Reply to exboyfil (Reply #8)

Sat Feb 16, 2019, 04:29 PM

Feb 2019

With no protections against self-incrimination, you become a very compelling witness for the prosecution...unless you subvert the constitution and continue to lie under oath.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If Manafort or Stone was pardoned and then compelled to testify [View all] Mr. Ected Feb 2019 OP

And Trump can pardon them again for perjury. nt Jarqui Feb 2019 #1

IMO, that would be a terrible decision. Eyeball_Kid Feb 2019 #2

Glad you mentioned the Russian Mob. Wellstone ruled Feb 2019 #3

Are you saying that each lie under oath could result in separate perjury counts? Mr. Ected Feb 2019 #4

Corrupt intent in a pardon could be problematic... alwaysinasnit Feb 2019 #5

Intent is exceedingly difficult to prove in a court of law Mr. Ected Feb 2019 #6

I guess it would depend on the standard of evidence required to prove it. If it is preponderance, alwaysinasnit Feb 2019 #7

With possible state and civil exboyfil Feb 2019 #8

That's my understanding. Similar to an admission of guilt. Mr. Ected Feb 2019 #9

Now you know why they'll never be pardoned, at least by Trump jmowreader Feb 2019 #10

Ah, but would they? Mr. Ected Feb 2019 #11

It doesn't matter either way jmowreader Feb 2019 #12